25.04.2013 Views

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Distinction<br />

between engagement<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

contracts<br />

26<br />

(1) A contract of engagement concluded by post comes in<strong>to</strong> existence at<br />

<strong>the</strong>placewhereandmomentwhen<strong>the</strong>personwhomakes<strong>the</strong>offer<br />

learns of <strong>the</strong> acceptance of <strong>the</strong> offer by <strong>the</strong> person <strong>to</strong> whom it was<br />

made. In <strong>the</strong> case of business contracts, <strong>the</strong> position is different namely<br />

<strong>the</strong> contract comes in<strong>to</strong> existence at <strong>the</strong> place where and moment<br />

when <strong>the</strong> letter of acceptance is mailed.<br />

(2) Not everyone who o<strong>the</strong>rwise has <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>to</strong> enter in<strong>to</strong> contracts in<br />

general has <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>to</strong> enter in<strong>to</strong> a contract of engagement. Only<br />

persons who are competent validly <strong>to</strong> marry one ano<strong>the</strong>r can enter<br />

in<strong>to</strong> a contract of engagement with each o<strong>the</strong>r. It is generally accepted<br />

that a person below <strong>the</strong> age of puberty (14 years for boys and 12 years<br />

for girls) is incompetent <strong>to</strong> enter in<strong>to</strong> an engagement. Moreover,<br />

section 26(1) of <strong>the</strong> Marriage Act 25 of 1961 provides that a girl<br />

under 15 years of age and a boy under 18 years of age require <strong>the</strong><br />

written consent of <strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs in order <strong>to</strong> marry.<br />

Where such person concludes an engagement, his or her engagement<br />

is regarded as conditional Ð in o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> obligation <strong>to</strong> marry<br />

is subject <strong>to</strong> a positive suspensive condition, namely, that <strong>the</strong><br />

Minister's consent <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> marriage be obtained. The obligations<br />

which flow from <strong>the</strong> contract of engagement will <strong>the</strong>refore become<br />

fully enforceable only once <strong>the</strong> Minister has granted permission in <strong>the</strong><br />

prescribed way. In <strong>the</strong> case of business contracts entered in<strong>to</strong> by a<br />

minor <strong>the</strong> general rule is that only <strong>the</strong> parent(s)/guardian of <strong>the</strong> minor<br />

needs <strong>to</strong> give consent. This issue is dealt with in <strong>the</strong> module on <strong>the</strong><br />

law of persons.<br />

(3) In certain circumstances, and for good reasons, an engagement may be<br />

terminated unilaterally. The test which is applied, is what a reasonable<br />

personwouldhavedonein<strong>the</strong>samecircumstances.In<strong>the</strong>caseof<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r contracts, one party may resile (unilaterally) only if <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

commits breach of contract, and <strong>the</strong>n in specific instances only, for<br />

example if <strong>the</strong> breach of contract is of a serious nature, or if <strong>the</strong> party<br />

has stipulated a right <strong>to</strong> resile in <strong>the</strong> contract.<br />

(4) In <strong>the</strong> case of o<strong>the</strong>r contracts, and with certain exceptions, one party is<br />

entitled <strong>to</strong> claim specific performance from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r: that is, that <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r party must do precisely what he or she under<strong>to</strong>ok <strong>to</strong> do. If <strong>the</strong><br />

position were <strong>the</strong> same in <strong>the</strong> case of a contract of engagement it<br />

would mean that one party would be able <strong>to</strong> force <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> marry<br />

him or her. In South Africa it has been unlawful <strong>to</strong> force anybody <strong>to</strong><br />

marry since 1838.<br />

(5) The method whereby compensation is calculated on breach of contract<br />

of engagement (breach of promise) is different from that used in <strong>the</strong><br />

case of o<strong>the</strong>r contracts. The rule for breach of contract is that damages<br />

are calculated in accordance with positive interest. In <strong>the</strong> case of<br />

breach of a contract of engagement, damages are calculated in a sui<br />

generis manner in <strong>the</strong> sense that damages are calculated in accordance<br />

with positive and negative interest. This issue is discussed under point<br />

5inthis<strong>study</strong>unit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!