25.04.2013 Views

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Special rules You must also note <strong>the</strong> special rules which apply in respect of divorce on<br />

<strong>the</strong> ground of mental illness or continuous unconsciousness. These rules<br />

are discussed on pages 123±124 of your prescribed textbook.<br />

Court cases<br />

Section 5A of <strong>the</strong><br />

Divorce Act 70 of<br />

1979<br />

164<br />

6 DOES THE COURT HAVE A DISCRETION TO REFUSE A DECREE OF<br />

DIVORCE?<br />

This question is discussed in your textbook on pages 24±126. Your<br />

textbook points out that <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> word ``may'' in sections 3, 4 and 5<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Divorce Act 70 of 1979 creates <strong>the</strong> impression that <strong>the</strong> court can<br />

refuse <strong>to</strong> grant a divorce although one of <strong>the</strong> grounds for divorce has been<br />

proved. Make sure that you know what was decided on this issue in Smit v<br />

Smit, Schwartz v Schwartz and Levy v Levy. These cases are discussed on<br />

pages 124±125 of your textbook. Also note <strong>the</strong> discussion on Schwartz v<br />

Schwartz on pages 183±186 of <strong>the</strong> casebook. Note especially <strong>the</strong> second<br />

paragraph of <strong>the</strong> note on <strong>the</strong> Schwartz case on page 186 in <strong>the</strong> casebook.<br />

Regarding <strong>the</strong> court's discretion, you should fur<strong>the</strong>r note <strong>the</strong> provisions of<br />

section 5A of <strong>the</strong> Divorce Act 70 of 1979. The provisions and <strong>the</strong> aim of<br />

section 5A are set out on pages 125±126 of <strong>the</strong> textbook. Note that <strong>the</strong><br />

court now has <strong>the</strong> discretion <strong>to</strong> refuse a decree of divorce if, as a result of<br />

religious prescriptions, one or both spouses will not be able <strong>to</strong> remarry<br />

once <strong>the</strong> court has granted a decree of divorce. In this manner <strong>the</strong> courts<br />

can now assist a Jewish woman whose husband refuses <strong>to</strong> grant her a<br />

divorce in terms of <strong>the</strong> Jewish faith. Also make sure that you know how<br />

<strong>the</strong> court forced <strong>the</strong> husband <strong>to</strong> grant his wife a Jewish religious divorce in<br />

Amar v Amar. (This case is briefly discussed on p 126 of <strong>the</strong> textbook.)<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, you also have <strong>to</strong> take note of <strong>the</strong> argument that section 5A of <strong>the</strong><br />

Divorce Act possibly violates <strong>the</strong> constitutional right <strong>to</strong> equality, and<br />

Cronje and Hea<strong>to</strong>n's criticism against this argument. These aspects are<br />

discussed on page 126 of <strong>the</strong> textbook. Lastly, you should also know that<br />

section 5A of <strong>the</strong> Divorce Act may possibly infringe upon <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong><br />

freedom of religion, but that it is submitted that <strong>the</strong> limitation of <strong>the</strong> right<br />

<strong>to</strong> freedom of religion is justifiable as <strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> limitation is <strong>the</strong><br />

achievement of real equality.<br />

QUESTIONS<br />

NB: Make sure that you can answer <strong>the</strong>se questions properly. They<br />

are designed <strong>to</strong> test your knowledge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>study</strong> material in<br />

this <strong>study</strong> unit.<br />

. Introduction<br />

(1) On which principle was <strong>the</strong> old divorce law based?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!