25.04.2013 Views

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACTIVITY<br />

On page 12 of your prescribed textbook <strong>the</strong>re is a discussion of <strong>the</strong> rule<br />

that <strong>the</strong> simple realisation by one of <strong>the</strong> parties that he or she no longer<br />

loves <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r party is not considered a justa causa for cancelling <strong>the</strong><br />

engagement. Discuss this rule with reference <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> criticism in your<br />

textbook.<br />

When you are asked <strong>to</strong> discuss something it means that you have <strong>to</strong> write<br />

a paragraph or essay on <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pic specified. It means that you have <strong>to</strong> set<br />

out and explain <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pic with reference <strong>to</strong> all aspects of <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pic, <strong>to</strong> case<br />

law, <strong>the</strong>ories, examples and whatever else is specifically asked for in <strong>the</strong><br />

question. All you have <strong>to</strong> discuss in this activity are <strong>the</strong> rule and <strong>the</strong><br />

criticism on <strong>the</strong> rule. Instead of <strong>the</strong> word discuss we could have used words<br />

like explain, describe, set out, summarise, advise, consider, write notes on,<br />

or we could have asked you what <strong>the</strong> legal position is.<br />

FEEDBACK<br />

A justa causa is a fact or an occurrence which comes about after <strong>the</strong><br />

engagement has been entered in<strong>to</strong> and which, according <strong>to</strong> human<br />

experience, will seriously jeopardise <strong>the</strong> chances of a happy and lasting<br />

marriage. In terms of <strong>the</strong> rule that is discussed in your textbook, <strong>the</strong><br />

realisation by one of <strong>the</strong> parties that he or she no longer loves <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

party will not seriously jeopardise <strong>the</strong> chances of a happy and lasting<br />

marriage. The termination of <strong>the</strong> engagement for this reason will thus<br />

constitute breach of promise. If it were o<strong>the</strong>rwise it would mean that <strong>the</strong><br />

engagement would lose its legal recognition as an agreement creating<br />

obligations.<br />

This rule can be criticised since this reason (that one of <strong>the</strong> parties realises<br />

that he or she no longer loves <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r party) should in fact be <strong>the</strong> most<br />

valid and sensible one for <strong>the</strong> lawful unilateral termination of <strong>the</strong><br />

agreement. It is obvious that <strong>the</strong> possibility of a successful marriage is<br />

seriously jeopardised if one of <strong>the</strong> parties realises, even before <strong>the</strong> marriage<br />

has been entered in<strong>to</strong>, that it will be a mistake.<br />

In addition it is not in <strong>the</strong> public interest if a person's freedom <strong>to</strong> conclude<br />

a marriage or <strong>to</strong> terminate an engagement is restricted because <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

possibility that claims will be made against him or her.<br />

Breach of promise Breach of promise, which is discussed on pages 12±15 of your textbook, is<br />

<strong>the</strong> unlawful termination of an engagement. The consequence of breach of<br />

promise is that <strong>the</strong> ``innocent'' party can withdraw from <strong>the</strong> engagement.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!