25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MISCHEVIOUS HOME INFLUENCES. 99<br />

exercise, to a certain degree, a moral check. It cannot be<br />

expected that the minister, as a general rule, should himself<br />

know .India ; while he will be exposed to perpetual solicitations<br />

from individuals and bodies, either entirely ignorant of that<br />

on those who<br />

country, or knowing only enough of it to impose<br />

know still less than themselves, and having very frequently<br />

objects in view other than the interests or good government of<br />

India. The influences likely to be brought to bear on him<br />

through the organs of popular opinion will, in the majority of<br />

cases, be equally misleading. The public opinion of England,<br />

itself necessarily unacquainted <strong>with</strong> Indian affairs, can only<br />

follow the promptings of those who take most pains to influence<br />

it, and these will generally be such as have some private interest<br />

to serve. It- is, therefore, your Petitioners submit, of the<br />

utmost importance that any council which may form a part of<br />

the Home Government of India should derive sufficient weight<br />

from its constitution, and from the relation it occupies to the<br />

minister, to be a substantial barrier against those inroads of<br />

self-interest and ignorance in this country from which the<br />

Government of India has hitherto been comparatively free, but<br />

against which it would be too much to expect<br />

should of itself afford a sufficient protection.<br />

that Parliament<br />

&quot; That your Petitioners cannot well conceive a worse form<br />

of government for India than a minister <strong>with</strong> a council whom<br />

he should be at liberty to consult or not at his pleasure, or<br />

whose advice he should be able to disregard, <strong>with</strong>out giving<br />

his reasons in writing, and in a manner likely to carry convic<br />

tion. Such an arrangement, your Petitioners submit, would be<br />

really liable to the objections, in their opinion, erroneously<br />

urged against the present system. Your Petitioners respectfully<br />

represent that any body of persons associated <strong>with</strong> the minister,<br />

which is not a check, will be a screen. Unless the council is<br />

so constituted as to be personally independent of the minister,<br />

unless it feels itself responsible for recording an opinion on<br />

every Indian subject, and pressing that opinion on the minister,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!