John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MISCHEVIOUS HOME INFLUENCES. 99<br />
exercise, to a certain degree, a moral check. It cannot be<br />
expected that the minister, as a general rule, should himself<br />
know .India ; while he will be exposed to perpetual solicitations<br />
from individuals and bodies, either entirely ignorant of that<br />
on those who<br />
country, or knowing only enough of it to impose<br />
know still less than themselves, and having very frequently<br />
objects in view other than the interests or good government of<br />
India. The influences likely to be brought to bear on him<br />
through the organs of popular opinion will, in the majority of<br />
cases, be equally misleading. The public opinion of England,<br />
itself necessarily unacquainted <strong>with</strong> Indian affairs, can only<br />
follow the promptings of those who take most pains to influence<br />
it, and these will generally be such as have some private interest<br />
to serve. It- is, therefore, your Petitioners submit, of the<br />
utmost importance that any council which may form a part of<br />
the Home Government of India should derive sufficient weight<br />
from its constitution, and from the relation it occupies to the<br />
minister, to be a substantial barrier against those inroads of<br />
self-interest and ignorance in this country from which the<br />
Government of India has hitherto been comparatively free, but<br />
against which it would be too much to expect<br />
should of itself afford a sufficient protection.<br />
that Parliament<br />
" That your Petitioners cannot well conceive a worse form<br />
of government for India than a minister <strong>with</strong> a council whom<br />
he should be at liberty to consult or not at his pleasure, or<br />
whose advice he should be able to disregard, <strong>with</strong>out giving<br />
his reasons in writing, and in a manner likely to carry convic<br />
tion. Such an arrangement, your Petitioners submit, would be<br />
really liable to the objections, in their opinion, erroneously<br />
urged against the present system. Your Petitioners respectfully<br />
represent that any body of persons associated <strong>with</strong> the minister,<br />
which is not a check, will be a screen. Unless the council is<br />
so constituted as to be personally independent of the minister,<br />
unless it feels itself responsible for recording an opinion on<br />
every Indian subject, and pressing that opinion on the minister,