John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
POLITICAL ARTICLES. 49<br />
and its consequences, and discourses on the relative merits of<br />
Tories, Whigs, and Radicals, <strong>with</strong> the usual complaints.<br />
Knowing the state of his health this year, the occurrence of his<br />
father s death, and his three months absence, we are surprised<br />
to find that he can contribute to the October number ; of<br />
which the first article is his on the Definition and Method of<br />
Political Economy. Doubtless, this had been lying by him,<br />
and had been brought out to fill a gap.<br />
In January, 1837, the political article is by Sir William<br />
Molesworth (The Terms of Alliance between Radicals and<br />
WT higs). <strong>Mill</strong> contributes only a short paper on an anonymous<br />
work of Arthur Helps, I believe his first publication Thoughts<br />
in the Cloister and the Crowd . This was another occasion<br />
when he displayed his passion for discerning and encouraging<br />
the first indications of talent and genius. I remember when I<br />
first came to London, this was one of the books he lent me ;<br />
and we agreed that, in point of thinking power, Helps had not<br />
fulfilled the promise of that little work.<br />
For April, 1837, he contributes a review of Fonblanque s<br />
England under Seven Administrations ; which would be easy<br />
work. The article is laudatory enough, but iterates the author s<br />
standing complaint against all the journals, namely, too great<br />
subserviency to the ministry in power. The political summary<br />
in the number is again by Molesworth. Carlyle contributes a<br />
short paper on the French Revolution, under an editorial careat.<br />
In July, appears the review of Carlyle s French Revolution,<br />
which <strong>Mill</strong> considers to have been one of his grand strokes in<br />
the Review. Carlyle s reputation was as yet hanging very<br />
dubious. The effect to be produced by the French Revolution<br />
was extremely uncertain. <strong>Mill</strong> was now well acquainted <strong>with</strong><br />
Carlyle, and knew how his peculiarities affected people, and how<br />
easily a prejudice might be created that would retard his fame<br />
for years. A judicious boldness was the only chance, and the<br />
article opens thus :<br />
This is not so much a history, as an epic poem ; and not<br />
4