25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POLITICAL ARTICLES. 49<br />

and its consequences, and discourses on the relative merits of<br />

Tories, Whigs, and Radicals, <strong>with</strong> the usual complaints.<br />

Knowing the state of his health this year, the occurrence of his<br />

father s death, and his three months absence, we are surprised<br />

to find that he can contribute to the October number ; of<br />

which the first article is his on the Definition and Method of<br />

Political Economy. Doubtless, this had been lying by him,<br />

and had been brought out to fill a gap.<br />

In January, 1837, the political article is by Sir William<br />

Molesworth (The Terms of Alliance between Radicals and<br />

WT higs). <strong>Mill</strong> contributes only a short paper on an anonymous<br />

work of Arthur Helps, I believe his first publication Thoughts<br />

in the Cloister and the Crowd . This was another occasion<br />

when he displayed his passion for discerning and encouraging<br />

the first indications of talent and genius. I remember when I<br />

first came to London, this was one of the books he lent me ;<br />

and we agreed that, in point of thinking power, Helps had not<br />

fulfilled the promise of that little work.<br />

For April, 1837, he contributes a review of Fonblanque s<br />

England under Seven Administrations ; which would be easy<br />

work. The article is laudatory enough, but iterates the author s<br />

standing complaint against all the journals, namely, too great<br />

subserviency to the ministry in power. The political summary<br />

in the number is again by Molesworth. Carlyle contributes a<br />

short paper on the French Revolution, under an editorial careat.<br />

In July, appears the review of Carlyle s French Revolution,<br />

which <strong>Mill</strong> considers to have been one of his grand strokes in<br />

the Review. Carlyle s reputation was as yet hanging very<br />

dubious. The effect to be produced by the French Revolution<br />

was extremely uncertain. <strong>Mill</strong> was now well acquainted <strong>with</strong><br />

Carlyle, and knew how his peculiarities affected people, and how<br />

easily a prejudice might be created that would retard his fame<br />

for years. A judicious boldness was the only chance, and the<br />

article opens thus :<br />

This is not so much a history, as an epic poem ; and not<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!