John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
144<br />
READINESS TO LEARN AND TO UNLEARN. 1849-1872.<br />
those very questions. He is generally<br />
originality<br />
admitted to combine<br />
and clearness as only very few men have done.<br />
The attempts to undervalue his reputation on either head have<br />
met <strong>with</strong> little countenance. Tried by an absolute stan<br />
dard, he may be found defective at points ;<br />
but who is entitled<br />
to cast the first stone? What other speculator from the<br />
beginning of philosophy has been equally original, and yet<br />
more uniformly precise, logical, and intelligible? He could<br />
split hairs <strong>with</strong> any<br />
scholastic. He could discern flaws in the<br />
closest dialectic ; or turn the flank of the most circumspect<br />
disputant. Unless I am greatly deceived, time will not impair<br />
the fascination of that subtle intellect. The number of men<br />
that can handle such weapons can never be so great<br />
render his writings a superfluity ;<br />
as to<br />
and, even when his doctrines<br />
shall have been more highly worked up, by other thinkers, his<br />
manner of putting them will be looked back upon <strong>with</strong> curious<br />
interest.<br />
He himself speaks <strong>with</strong> not unbecoming pride of his being<br />
always open to new views. To the last, he continued (he says)<br />
to learn and to unlearn. Of no man can this be stated<br />
absolutely.<br />
Yet <strong>Mill</strong> stood very high on the point of receptive-<br />
ness. He did not shut up his mind to new impressions at forty.<br />
This, however,, was merely another form of his anxiety to<br />
know whatever could be said by any one upon any question.<br />
Wishing always to do his very best, he neglected no available<br />
means. Before beginning to produce, he took ample time to<br />
absorb; and, better than most men, hit the happy mean<br />
between haste and procrastination. He might have occasionally<br />
improved his work by a little more elaboration, but the loss in<br />
quantity would not have been compensated by the difference<br />
in quality.<br />
He tells us, in connexion <strong>with</strong> his readings at Grote s house,<br />
that he<br />
"<br />
dated from these conversations my own real inaugura<br />
tion as an original and independent thinker. It was also<br />
through them that I acquired, or very much strengthened, a