25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LITTLE INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF BOOKS. 25<br />

sequence superficial. It is observable how rare is his avowal<br />

of interest in the subjects of the classical books : Lucian is an<br />

his father to<br />

exception ; Quintilian is another. He was set by<br />

make an analysis of Aristotle s Rhetoric and Organon, and<br />

doubtless his mind was cast for Logic from the first. His<br />

inaptitude for the matter of the Greek and Latin poets is<br />

unambiguously shown ; he read Homer in Greek, but his<br />

interest was awakened only by Pope s translation. His read<br />

ings in the English poets for the most part made no impression<br />

upon him whatever. He had a boyish delight in action,<br />

battles, energy and heroism ; and seeing that whatever he felt,<br />

he felt intensely, his devotion to that kind of literature was<br />

very ardent. But, whether from early habits or from native<br />

peculiarity, he had all his life an extraordinary power<br />

of re<br />

reading books. His first reading merely skimmed the subject:<br />

if a book pleased him, and he wished to study it, he read it<br />

two or three times, not after an interval, but immediately. I<br />

cannot but think that in this practice there is a waste of power.<br />

It was impossible for his father to test his study of Greek<br />

and Latin works, except in select cases ; and hence it must<br />

have been very slovenly. In Mathematics, he had little or no<br />

assistance, but there he would check himself. His readings in<br />

Physical Science were also untutored : unless at Montpellier,<br />

he never had any masters, and his knowledge was at no time<br />

mature.<br />

If I were to compare him in his fifteenth year <strong>with</strong> the most<br />

intellectual youth that I have ever known, or heard or read<br />

of, I should say that his attainments on the whole are not<br />

unparalleled, although, I admit, very rare. His classical know<br />

ledge, such as it was, might be forced upon a clever youth of<br />

that age. The Mathematics could not be so easily com<br />

manded. The best mathematicians have seldom been capable<br />

of beginning Euclid at eight or nine,* and even granting that<br />

* Locke knew a young gentleman who could demonstrate several proposi<br />

tions in Euclid before he was thirteen.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!