John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LITTLE INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF BOOKS. 25<br />
sequence superficial. It is observable how rare is his avowal<br />
of interest in the subjects of the classical books : Lucian is an<br />
his father to<br />
exception ; Quintilian is another. He was set by<br />
make an analysis of Aristotle s Rhetoric and Organon, and<br />
doubtless his mind was cast for Logic from the first. His<br />
inaptitude for the matter of the Greek and Latin poets is<br />
unambiguously shown ; he read Homer in Greek, but his<br />
interest was awakened only by Pope s translation. His read<br />
ings in the English poets for the most part made no impression<br />
upon him whatever. He had a boyish delight in action,<br />
battles, energy and heroism ; and seeing that whatever he felt,<br />
he felt intensely, his devotion to that kind of literature was<br />
very ardent. But, whether from early habits or from native<br />
peculiarity, he had all his life an extraordinary power<br />
of re<br />
reading books. His first reading merely skimmed the subject:<br />
if a book pleased him, and he wished to study it, he read it<br />
two or three times, not after an interval, but immediately. I<br />
cannot but think that in this practice there is a waste of power.<br />
It was impossible for his father to test his study of Greek<br />
and Latin works, except in select cases ; and hence it must<br />
have been very slovenly. In Mathematics, he had little or no<br />
assistance, but there he would check himself. His readings in<br />
Physical Science were also untutored : unless at Montpellier,<br />
he never had any masters, and his knowledge was at no time<br />
mature.<br />
If I were to compare him in his fifteenth year <strong>with</strong> the most<br />
intellectual youth that I have ever known, or heard or read<br />
of, I should say that his attainments on the whole are not<br />
unparalleled, although, I admit, very rare. His classical know<br />
ledge, such as it was, might be forced upon a clever youth of<br />
that age. The Mathematics could not be so easily com<br />
manded. The best mathematicians have seldom been capable<br />
of beginning Euclid at eight or nine,* and even granting that<br />
* Locke knew a young gentleman who could demonstrate several proposi<br />
tions in Euclid before he was thirteen.