25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

l68 SYMPATHY IN OPINIONS. 1849-1872.<br />

apparent in mixed races like ourselves. In mental peculiarities,<br />

contrast also dominates in many subtle forms which I need not<br />

here dilate upon.<br />

<strong>Mill</strong> would fain make us believe that the attachment in his<br />

case was based altogether on mental superiority intellectual<br />

and moral. The influence of beauty in general, the special<br />

attraction of fair for dark, of tall for short, and other such in<br />

fluences, he would have us leave entirely out of the account.<br />

Hard thinkers are most often charmed, not by other thinkers,<br />

but by minds of the more concrete and artistic mould. He<br />

would have perhaps allowed something of this sort, in his case,<br />

<strong>with</strong> the condition, that the artistic element was merely one of<br />

the aspects of a genius that took the first rank in every form<br />

of intellectual greatness.<br />

The influence of contrast in producing the love of attach<br />

ment must be so expressed as not to exclude sympathy or<br />

agreement in opinions, objects, and aspirations; which is one<br />

great cause of individual likings. This is a broad general fact,<br />

but does not go far towards explaining the select overpowering<br />

attachments. <strong>Mill</strong> tells us that his opinions on the complete<br />

equality between the sexes in all legal, political, social, and do<br />

mestic relations were, he believed, more than anything else,<br />

the originating cause of the interest his wife felt in him. This<br />

is so far in conformity <strong>with</strong> the general principle ; yet does not<br />

help us very much.<br />

His hyperbolical language of unbounded laudation, which<br />

has been the cause of so much wonderment, can be somewhat<br />

checked by the details that he himself supplies. His accus<br />

tomed precision does not desert him in regard to these ; and<br />

we are enabled to form a probable estimate of what his wife<br />

really was to him.<br />

In the first place, he tells us that the Logic owed nothing to<br />

her, except the minutiae of composition. Then as to the<br />

Political Economy, the purely scientific part he did not learn<br />

from her. What was entirely her work was the chapter en-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!