25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 ADDRESSING THE FEELINGS. 1849-1872.<br />

able polemical aptitude. But I shall speak now of his persua<br />

sive power, which I conceive to be very great on the whole,<br />

and susceptible of being precisely denned.<br />

The power of persuasion was <strong>with</strong> him not much a matter<br />

of mere style ;<br />

it lay more in his command of thoughts, and in<br />

his tact in discerning what would suit the persons addressed.<br />

When he set himself to argue a point, his information and<br />

command of principles usually enabled him to exhaust his case.<br />

His political writing is enough to show this.<br />

It was seldom that he was deficient in knowledge of his<br />

audience. If he ever failed here, it was in matters of religion,<br />

where he was necessarily little informed, and on the women<br />

question, where his feelings carried him too far.<br />

Not only could he shape arguments to the reason, properly<br />

so called, he could also address the feelings. The Liberty and<br />

the Subjection of Women, as well as his political writing generally,<br />

exemplify what might be called impassioned oratory ; they<br />

leave nothing unsaid that could enlist the strongest feelings of<br />

the readers. His best Parliamentary speeches appealed to the<br />

understanding and to the feelings alike, and he seldom, so far<br />

as I can judge, lost ground for want of suiting himself to a most<br />

difficult assembly. Although he could not clothe his feelings<br />

<strong>with</strong> the richness of poetry, he could warm <strong>with</strong> his subject, and<br />

work by the force of sympathy.<br />

All this, as I have already observed, had to do <strong>with</strong> know<br />

ledge and thinking power, more than <strong>with</strong> style. In the<br />

oratory of rhetoric, he was entirely wanting. He could appeal<br />

to men s feelings by suitable circumstances plainly and even<br />

forcibly stated ; but that luxuriance of verbal display, whereby<br />

the emotions can be roused <strong>with</strong> a hurricane s might, was not<br />

a part of his equipment. He could not be an orator in the<br />

same sense as the two Pitts, Burke, Canning, Brougham,<br />

Macaulay, D Israeli, or any of our rhetorical writers ; although<br />

I am not sure that he might not often have rivalled such men<br />

in actual effect, by the gifts that were peculiarly his own.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!