John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
184 ADDRESSING THE FEELINGS. 1849-1872.<br />
able polemical aptitude. But I shall speak now of his persua<br />
sive power, which I conceive to be very great on the whole,<br />
and susceptible of being precisely denned.<br />
The power of persuasion was <strong>with</strong> him not much a matter<br />
of mere style ;<br />
it lay more in his command of thoughts, and in<br />
his tact in discerning what would suit the persons addressed.<br />
When he set himself to argue a point, his information and<br />
command of principles usually enabled him to exhaust his case.<br />
His political writing is enough to show this.<br />
It was seldom that he was deficient in knowledge of his<br />
audience. If he ever failed here, it was in matters of religion,<br />
where he was necessarily little informed, and on the women<br />
question, where his feelings carried him too far.<br />
Not only could he shape arguments to the reason, properly<br />
so called, he could also address the feelings. The Liberty and<br />
the Subjection of Women, as well as his political writing generally,<br />
exemplify what might be called impassioned oratory ; they<br />
leave nothing unsaid that could enlist the strongest feelings of<br />
the readers. His best Parliamentary speeches appealed to the<br />
understanding and to the feelings alike, and he seldom, so far<br />
as I can judge, lost ground for want of suiting himself to a most<br />
difficult assembly. Although he could not clothe his feelings<br />
<strong>with</strong> the richness of poetry, he could warm <strong>with</strong> his subject, and<br />
work by the force of sympathy.<br />
All this, as I have already observed, had to do <strong>with</strong> know<br />
ledge and thinking power, more than <strong>with</strong> style. In the<br />
oratory of rhetoric, he was entirely wanting. He could appeal<br />
to men s feelings by suitable circumstances plainly and even<br />
forcibly stated ; but that luxuriance of verbal display, whereby<br />
the emotions can be roused <strong>with</strong> a hurricane s might, was not<br />
a part of his equipment. He could not be an orator in the<br />
same sense as the two Pitts, Burke, Canning, Brougham,<br />
Macaulay, D Israeli, or any of our rhetorical writers ; although<br />
I am not sure that he might not often have rivalled such men<br />
in actual effect, by the gifts that were peculiarly his own.