25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ADOPTIONS FROM COMTE. 73<br />

greatest living authority on scientific methods in &quot;. general On<br />

p. 506, 1. 5 from bottom, before<br />

first edition has<br />

&quot; To<br />

prove (in short),&quot; the<br />

&quot;<br />

It is therefore well said of M. Comte &quot;.<br />

In<br />

p. 512, 1. 13 from top, the words &quot;but deem them,&quot; are<br />

followed in ist ed. by &quot;<strong>with</strong> the single exception of M. Comte&quot;.<br />

In p.<br />

1. 513, 9 from<br />

&quot;<br />

top, after up to the present time,&quot; a long<br />

sentence of reference to Comte is left out. In p.<br />

1. 530, 14<br />

from top, after<br />

&quot;<br />

attempted to characterise,&quot; there is omitted<br />

the clause<br />

&quot;<br />

but which hitherto are to my knowledge exem<br />

plified nowhere but in the writings of M. Comte &quot;.<br />

The distinction of Statics and Dynamics was carried by <strong>Mill</strong><br />

into the plan of his Political Economy. It also entered into<br />

his Representative Government ; and if he had written a com<br />

plete work on Sociology, he would have made it<br />

his arrangement as Comte did.<br />

the basis of<br />

<strong>Mill</strong> s correspondence <strong>with</strong> Comte began in 1841. I heard<br />

from himself a good deal of the substance of it as it went on.<br />

Comte s part being now published, we can judge of the charac<br />

ter of the whole, and infer much of <strong>Mill</strong> s part in the work. In<br />

1842 and 1843, the letters on both sides were overflowing <strong>with</strong><br />

mutual regard. It was Comte s nature to be very frank, and<br />

he was circumstantial and minute in his accounts of himself<br />

and his ways. <strong>Mill</strong> was unusually open ; and revealed, what he<br />

seldom told to anybody, all the fluctuations in his bodily and<br />

mental condition. In one of the early letters, he coined the<br />

word<br />

and threw<br />

&quot;<br />

pedantocracy,&quot; which Comte caught up,<br />

about him right and left ever after. Already, in 1842, troubles<br />

were brewing for him in Paris, partly in consequence<br />

of his<br />

peculiar tenets, and still more from his unsparing abuse of the<br />

notables of Paris, the foremost object of his hate being the<br />

all-powerful Arago. His personal situation, always detailed<br />

<strong>with</strong> the utmost fulness, makes a considerable fraction of the<br />

correspondence on his side. When in 1843, the<br />

&quot;<br />

Polytechnic<br />

pedantocracy,&quot; that is to say, the Council of the Polytechnic<br />

School, for which he was Examiner, first assumed a hostile

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!