John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EXAMPLES OF WIT. 1 85<br />
The powerful adjunct of Wit was hardly <strong>with</strong>in his reach,<br />
any more than rhetorical display in general. He had the sense<br />
of humour, but not a sufficient creative power to embody it in<br />
writing ; and he was careful not to attempt what he could not<br />
do well. I can recall but one example of real Wit such as<br />
might have come from Sydney Smith or Fonblanque.<br />
In his article on Corporation and Church Property, he replies<br />
to the stock arguments against diverting old foundations. He<br />
makes full allowance for compensation to present holders of<br />
life interests. Still this does not appease the opposition :<br />
"<br />
Would you rob the Church ? it is asked. And at the<br />
sound of these words rise up images of rapine, violence,<br />
plunder ;<br />
and .every sentiment of repugnance which would be<br />
excited by a proposal to take away from an individual the<br />
earnings of his toil or the inheritance of his fathers, comes<br />
heightened in the particular case by the added idea of sacrilege.<br />
"<br />
But the Church ! Who is the Church ? Who is it that<br />
we desire to rob ? Who are the persons whose property,<br />
whose rights we are proposing to take away ?<br />
" Not the clergy ; from them we do not propose to take<br />
anything. To every man who now benefits by the endowment,<br />
we have said that we would leave his entire income ; at least<br />
until the State shall offer, as the purchase money of his services<br />
in some other shape, advantages which he himself shall regard<br />
as equivalent.<br />
"<br />
But if not the clergy, surely we are not proposing to rob<br />
the : laity on the contrary, they are robbed now, if the fact be,<br />
that the application of the money to its is<br />
present purpose no<br />
longer advisable. We are exhorting the laity to claim their<br />
property out of the hands of the clergy; who are not the<br />
Church, but only the managing members of the association.<br />
"<br />
Qui trompe-t-on id ? asks Figaro. Qui vole-t-on id ? may<br />
well be asked. What man, woman, or child, is the victim of<br />
this robbery? Who suffers by the robbery when everybody<br />
robs nobody ? But though no man, woman, or child is robbed,