John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
l6o SHORTCOMINGS OF SYMPATHIES. 1849-1872.<br />
Although his services to the public were spread over his life,<br />
in alternation <strong>with</strong> tracts of recreation and pure enjoyment, and<br />
although they were, to an unusual degree, pleasurable in the<br />
performance, yet I do not doubt that he could, if necessary,<br />
have given still greater proofs of his disinterestedness and zeal<br />
for humanity. He could have embraced a much more self-<br />
denying career ; like Howard, in Bentham s felicitous eulogy,<br />
he might have<br />
"<br />
lived an apostle, and died a ". martyr<br />
I must now endeavour to point out what were the more<br />
conspicuous shortcomings of the generous or sympathetic side<br />
of <strong>Mill</strong> s nature. Everyone s sympathies come to a stop<br />
somewhere ; and a character is not completely stated <strong>with</strong>out<br />
assigning the limit. I am not speaking<br />
of the case where<br />
antagonism is a necessary consequence of attachment ; we<br />
must be enemies to those that make enemies of us. I allude<br />
to cases where I believe <strong>Mill</strong> s sentiments may be fairly con<br />
sidered as excessive and uncalled for. Had his judgment of<br />
the circumstances been perfect, the severity might have been<br />
right ; but he at times assumed too readily his own infallibility,<br />
and condemned people accordingly. In the Autobiography, he<br />
recants the harshness of his judgment upon the radical leaders<br />
of the years following the Reform Bill ; yet he does not apolo<br />
gize for such language as the following.<br />
of Fonblanque :<br />
"<br />
I quote from the Life<br />
In 1838 these differences [among the Radicals] appear to<br />
have become more serious ;<br />
ing <strong>Mill</strong> <strong>with</strong> identifying himself <strong>with</strong> the<br />
and the<br />
"<br />
and we find Fonblanque reproach<br />
"<br />
"<br />
Grote conclave<br />
philosophical Radicals," and <strong>Mill</strong>, in defending<br />
himself against the charge, repudiating the doctrines of Grote<br />
and his coterie, as<br />
"<br />
persons whom I have nothing to do <strong>with</strong>,<br />
and to whose opinions you are far more nearly allied than I<br />
am. . . . There may be such a conclave, but I know<br />
of it. for I have never been <strong>with</strong>in the door of Grote s<br />
nothing<br />
house in Eccleston Street, and have been for the last few years