25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

l6o SHORTCOMINGS OF SYMPATHIES. 1849-1872.<br />

Although his services to the public were spread over his life,<br />

in alternation <strong>with</strong> tracts of recreation and pure enjoyment, and<br />

although they were, to an unusual degree, pleasurable in the<br />

performance, yet I do not doubt that he could, if necessary,<br />

have given still greater proofs of his disinterestedness and zeal<br />

for humanity. He could have embraced a much more self-<br />

denying career ; like Howard, in Bentham s felicitous eulogy,<br />

he might have<br />

&quot;<br />

lived an apostle, and died a &quot;. martyr<br />

I must now endeavour to point out what were the more<br />

conspicuous shortcomings of the generous or sympathetic side<br />

of <strong>Mill</strong> s nature. Everyone s sympathies come to a stop<br />

somewhere ; and a character is not completely stated <strong>with</strong>out<br />

assigning the limit. I am not speaking<br />

of the case where<br />

antagonism is a necessary consequence of attachment ; we<br />

must be enemies to those that make enemies of us. I allude<br />

to cases where I believe <strong>Mill</strong> s sentiments may be fairly con<br />

sidered as excessive and uncalled for. Had his judgment of<br />

the circumstances been perfect, the severity might have been<br />

right ; but he at times assumed too readily his own infallibility,<br />

and condemned people accordingly. In the Autobiography, he<br />

recants the harshness of his judgment upon the radical leaders<br />

of the years following the Reform Bill ; yet he does not apolo<br />

gize for such language as the following.<br />

of Fonblanque :<br />

&quot;<br />

I quote from the Life<br />

In 1838 these differences [among the Radicals] appear to<br />

have become more serious ;<br />

ing <strong>Mill</strong> <strong>with</strong> identifying himself <strong>with</strong> the<br />

and the<br />

&quot;<br />

and we find Fonblanque reproach<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

Grote conclave<br />

philosophical Radicals,&quot; and <strong>Mill</strong>, in defending<br />

himself against the charge, repudiating the doctrines of Grote<br />

and his coterie, as<br />

&quot;<br />

persons whom I have nothing to do <strong>with</strong>,<br />

and to whose opinions you are far more nearly allied than I<br />

am. . . . There may be such a conclave, but I know<br />

of it. for I have never been <strong>with</strong>in the door of Grote s<br />

nothing<br />

house in Eccleston Street, and have been for the last few years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!