John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 88 VOICE AND ELOCUTION. 1849-1872.<br />
and lightness, and did not restrain their display. He did not<br />
shrink from contact <strong>with</strong> ordinary mortals, and had a great<br />
many occasions of encountering<br />
such :<br />
if<br />
it were only during the<br />
six hours a day, for thirty-five years, that he spent in a busy<br />
State office, encompassed <strong>with</strong> superiors, equals, and inferiors.<br />
He had wit and readiness such as we do not find often sur<br />
"<br />
passed in the higher circles ". No one pretends that he was<br />
a Sydney Smith. I believe that the one thing that took the<br />
London public by surprise in 1865, and carried his election for<br />
Westminster, was his wit and readiness.<br />
The material of a man s conversation must be his amassed<br />
knowledge ; and a writer shows that by his books. The nearest<br />
approach to actual conversation is letter-writing ; we may judge<br />
of people s talk by their familiar correspondence. What books<br />
and letters fail to show is conversation as such ; and includes<br />
elements of considerable efficacy in themselves. All that re<br />
lates to voice, delivery, gesture, and play of countenance the<br />
purely physical part is imperfectly conceivable through mere<br />
description. The part not physical is the conduct as regards<br />
the listeners ; which fluctuates between the two extremes of<br />
lecture or monologue, in the Coleridge style, and short question<br />
and answer, in the Socratic style.<br />
<strong>Mill</strong> s voice was agreeable, although not specially melodious ;<br />
it was thin and weak. His articulation was not very clear.<br />
His elocution was good, <strong>with</strong>out being particularly showy or<br />
impressive ; he had a mastery of emphasis ; his modulation was<br />
sufficiently removed from monotone, so that there was nothing<br />
wearying in his manner. He had not much gesture, but it was<br />
all in keeping ; his features were expressive <strong>with</strong>out his aiming<br />
at strong effects. Everything<br />
about him had the cast of<br />
sobriety and reserve ; he did no more than the end required.<br />
There was so little of marked peculiarity in his speaking, that I<br />
never knew anyone that could mimic him successfully in the<br />
enunciation of a sentence. Very few people could assume his