25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 88 VOICE AND ELOCUTION. 1849-1872.<br />

and lightness, and did not restrain their display. He did not<br />

shrink from contact <strong>with</strong> ordinary mortals, and had a great<br />

many occasions of encountering<br />

such :<br />

if<br />

it were only during the<br />

six hours a day, for thirty-five years, that he spent in a busy<br />

State office, encompassed <strong>with</strong> superiors, equals, and inferiors.<br />

He had wit and readiness such as we do not find often sur<br />

&quot;<br />

passed in the higher circles &quot;. No one pretends that he was<br />

a Sydney Smith. I believe that the one thing that took the<br />

London public by surprise in 1865, and carried his election for<br />

Westminster, was his wit and readiness.<br />

The material of a man s conversation must be his amassed<br />

knowledge ; and a writer shows that by his books. The nearest<br />

approach to actual conversation is letter-writing ; we may judge<br />

of people s talk by their familiar correspondence. What books<br />

and letters fail to show is conversation as such ; and includes<br />

elements of considerable efficacy in themselves. All that re<br />

lates to voice, delivery, gesture, and play of countenance the<br />

purely physical part is imperfectly conceivable through mere<br />

description. The part not physical is the conduct as regards<br />

the listeners ; which fluctuates between the two extremes of<br />

lecture or monologue, in the Coleridge style, and short question<br />

and answer, in the Socratic style.<br />

<strong>Mill</strong> s voice was agreeable, although not specially melodious ;<br />

it was thin and weak. His articulation was not very clear.<br />

His elocution was good, <strong>with</strong>out being particularly showy or<br />

impressive ; he had a mastery of emphasis ; his modulation was<br />

sufficiently removed from monotone, so that there was nothing<br />

wearying in his manner. He had not much gesture, but it was<br />

all in keeping ; his features were expressive <strong>with</strong>out his aiming<br />

at strong effects. Everything<br />

about him had the cast of<br />

sobriety and reserve ; he did no more than the end required.<br />

There was so little of marked peculiarity in his speaking, that I<br />

never knew anyone that could mimic him successfully in the<br />

enunciation of a sentence. Very few people could assume his

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!