John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I;j ON THE SUBJECTION OF WOMEN. 1849-1872.<br />
the beginning of 1868, declared, as he says, his whole mind on<br />
the subject of Ireland chiefly as regarded the Land and is<br />
couched in very strong language indeed. He believed that this<br />
pamphlet helped to determine Mr. Gladstone to commence his<br />
Irish Legislation <strong>with</strong> the Church, leaving the Land to a later<br />
operation.<br />
The year 1869, his first year of release, saw the publication<br />
of his last book The Subjection of Women, together <strong>with</strong> the<br />
two first articles in his fourth volume of Dissertations<br />
"<br />
"<br />
Endowments," and Labour and its claims," a review of Mr.<br />
Thornton s work on that subject.<br />
The volume on the Subjection of Women, he tells us, was first<br />
written in 1861. It was, he says, a joint production ; portions<br />
were written by Miss Taylor, while his share was the result of<br />
innumerable conversations and discussions <strong>with</strong> his wife. How<br />
ever the merits be partitioned, it is a book of very marked<br />
character. It is the most sustained exposition of <strong>Mill</strong> s life-long<br />
theme the abuses of power. The extent of the illustration<br />
and the emphasis of the language render it the best extant<br />
homily on the evils of subjection in general ;<br />
while the same<br />
arts are maintained in dealing <strong>with</strong> the application to the dis<br />
abilities of women. This case, which of all others most engaged<br />
his feelings, is, I think, the one instance where he may be<br />
charged <strong>with</strong> overstraining. In discussing political freedom at<br />
large, he is always sufficiently alive to the necessities of govern<br />
ment ; in the present question, he leads us to suppose that the<br />
relations of men and women between themselves may work<br />
upon a purely voluntary principle. He abstains here and else<br />
where from advocating divorce pure and simple, because of<br />
the complications attending the : question while he does<br />
not show what fe the remedy when a man and a woman,<br />
united by the marriage bond, are unable to co-operate as equal<br />
partners.<br />
His handling of the mental equality of the sexes is, to my