25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CORRESPONDENCE OF 1841. 63<br />

article admitted into the Westminster for September ; an ex<br />

position of the two scientific novelties the Electrotype and<br />

Daguerreotype. In July, 1841, was published a second article<br />

entitled<br />

&quot; The<br />

Properties of Matter,&quot; to which I owed the first<br />

notice taken of me by Mr. Grote. Both these articles did me<br />

good <strong>with</strong> <strong>Mill</strong>. In the same autumn, 1841, Robertson, who<br />

was now very much at sea himself, came down to Aberdeen,<br />

and made a long stay ; during which I had abundant talk<br />

<strong>with</strong> him my early friend David Masson being also of the party.<br />

Robertson occasionally wrote to <strong>Mill</strong>, and at last incited me to<br />

write to him. I scarcely remember anything of the terms of<br />

the letter, but I have preserved his reply, dated 2ist Sept., 1841.<br />

After my first meeting <strong>with</strong> Robertson, nearly three years<br />

previous, I assiduously perused the back numbers of the London<br />

as well as each new<br />

and London and Westminster Reviews,<br />

number as it appeared, whereby I became thoroughly familiar<br />

ized <strong>with</strong> <strong>Mill</strong> s ideas: and was thus able to exchange thoughts<br />

<strong>with</strong> him on his own subjects. I was engaged for the succeeding<br />

winter to teach the Class of Moral Philosophy in Marischal<br />

College, as substitute for the professor ; and his letter is chiefly<br />

a comment upon this fact. Not<strong>with</strong>standing that he was then<br />

intently occupied in finishing his Logic for the press, he wrote<br />

me several other letters in the course of the winter. In the<br />

one immediately following (Oct. 15) he made mention of<br />

Comte, in these terms<br />

&quot; Have<br />

you ever looked into Comte s--<br />

Cours de Philosophic Positive ? He makes some mistakes, but<br />

on the whole I think it very near the grandest work of this<br />

age.&quot; From the remaining letters, I can gather that I had<br />

written him a good deal upon Whewell s writings, as well as on<br />

Herschel, and on his own coming book. Among other things,<br />

he sketched out for me a course of reading on Political and<br />

Historical Philosophy. He also criticized in detail the strong<br />

and the weak points of an article published by me in the<br />

Westminster in Jan. 1842, <strong>with</strong> the somewhat misleading title<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;.<br />

Toys

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!