John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DISCUSSION OF COMTE IN DETAIL. 7 1<br />
displayed in the five years of their correspondence from 1841<br />
to 1846. In our many conversations, during<br />
the summer oi<br />
1842, <strong>Mill</strong> occasionally mentioned Comte, but not in a way to<br />
give me any clear conception of what his merits consisted in.<br />
Among his associates at that time was William Smith, lately<br />
dead, and known as the author of Thorndale and various other<br />
works. He was a pupil of the <strong>Mill</strong>s in Philosophy, and oc<br />
cupied himself in contributing to magazines.<br />
In the winter of<br />
that year, he wrote a review of Comte in Blackwood (March,<br />
1 843), giving very well selected extracts ; and from these I<br />
derived my first impression of the peculiar force of the book.<br />
I remember particularly being struck <strong>with</strong> the observations on<br />
the metaphysical and critical stage, as a vein of remark quite<br />
original.<br />
It was in the summer of that year, 1843, that I read the<br />
work for myself. I was in London as before, and had the<br />
same opportunities of conversing <strong>with</strong> <strong>Mill</strong>. We discussed the<br />
work chapter by chapter, up to the last volume, which I had<br />
not begun when I left town. We were very much at one both<br />
as to the merits and as to the defects. The errors were<br />
mostly of a kind that could be remedied by ordinary men<br />
better informed on special points than Comte ; while the<br />
systematic array was untouched. The improvement effected<br />
in the Classification of the Sciences was apparent at a glance ;<br />
while the carrying out of the Hierarchy, involving the double<br />
dependence of each science upon the preceding, first as to<br />
Doctrine and next as to Method, raised the scheme above the<br />
usual barrenness of science-classifications. <strong>Mill</strong> had already<br />
seized <strong>with</strong> alacrity, and embodied in the Logic, Comte s great<br />
and I<br />
distinction between Social Statics and Social Dynamics ;<br />
was even more strongly impressed than he was, respecting the<br />
value of that distinction, as an instrument of analysis. Comte,<br />
according to his plan of pushing forward the ideas of each of<br />
the fundamental sciences into the succeeding, had taken up<br />
the distinction in Abstract Mechanics, and carried it first into