25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INADEQUACY OF THE RELIGIOUS DISCUSSIONS.<br />

139<br />

proper character, and who view the world as he viewed it. In<br />

a purely secular scheme of life, the ideal that he holds forth<br />

must seem greatly over-strained.<br />

<strong>Mill</strong> was, doubtless, able to state and to give reasons for his<br />

own view of the plan of the universe. He was also highly<br />

qualified to discuss particular portions of the groundwork of<br />

the prevailing creeds. I think, however, that he was too little<br />

versed in the writings of Theologians, to attack their doctrines<br />

<strong>with</strong> any effect. He absented himself during his whole life,<br />

except as a mere child, from religious services. He scarcely ever<br />

read a Theological book. He could not help knowing the<br />

main positions of Theology from our general literature.<br />

That, however, was scarcely enough for basing an attack<br />

upon Christianity along the whole line. Just about the<br />

time when the Essays on Religion appeared, Strauss s last book,<br />

&quot;<br />

called The Old Faith and the New,&quot; was published in this<br />

country. Anyone reading it would, I think, be struck <strong>with</strong> its<br />

immense superiority to <strong>Mill</strong> s work, in all but the logic and<br />

metaphysics. Strauss speaks like a man thoroughly at home<br />

<strong>with</strong> his subject. He knows both sides as a life-study can<br />

enable one to know them. <strong>Mill</strong>, even supposing him to be in<br />

the right, would not be convincing. He may puzzle opponents,<br />

he may compel them to change front ; still, he does not meet<br />

their difficulties, nor take account of what they feel to be their<br />

strength. He is not even well read in the sceptics that pre<br />

ceded him. If he had studied the whole cycle of Hume s<br />

argumentative treatises, so lucidly condensed by Mr. Leslie<br />

Stephen, he might have put his case on the negative side much<br />

better, while he would have been led to modify his constructive<br />

Theism.<br />

It has been said by his opponents, <strong>with</strong> some show of<br />

plausibility, that <strong>Mill</strong> was at bottom a religious man. Setting<br />

aside special dogmas, and looking only to the cheering influence<br />

of religion on its most favourable side an influence that may<br />

be exerted in a variety of ways we may call his aspirations and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!