John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
176 RHETORICAL ARTS. 1849-1872.<br />
"<br />
"<br />
which and<br />
" who ". He never entered into the distinction<br />
"<br />
"<br />
of meaning between those two, and that as a relative. Like<br />
many other writers, he used "that" only as a relief after too<br />
"<br />
whiches ". Here is an : example<br />
"<br />
Inasmuch as any,<br />
many<br />
even unintentional, deviation from truth, does that much<br />
towards weakening the trustworthiness of human assertion,<br />
which is not only the principal support of all present social<br />
well-being, but the insufficiency of which does more than any<br />
thing that can be named to keep back civilisation, virtue,<br />
everything on which human happiness on the largest scale de<br />
familiarity <strong>with</strong> French is apt to produce an<br />
". pends Early<br />
insensibility to the clogging effect of a great number of<br />
"<br />
whiches," and a consequent inattention to the many easy de<br />
vices for keeping clear of the excess.<br />
In the use of the pronoun<br />
"<br />
usually taken by good writers of the present day, to avoid un<br />
certainty and ambiguity of reference.<br />
His father s weakness for<br />
"<br />
the<br />
it," he did not display the care<br />
"<br />
I know not form is occa<br />
sionally seen in him also.<br />
Instances of looseness not falling under any special type are<br />
frequent enough. The following might possibly have been cor<br />
rected, if he had lived to superintend the printing of the work<br />
where it occurs :<br />
" The patience of all the founders of the<br />
Society was at last exhausted, except me and Roebuck ".<br />
Of arts of the rhetorical kind in the structure of his sentences,<br />
he was by no means wanting. He could be short and pithy,<br />
which goes a great way. He had likewise caught up, probably<br />
in a good measure from the French writers, his peculiar epi<br />
grammatic smartness, which he practised also in conversation.<br />
He would often express himself thus :<br />
"<br />
It is one thing to tell<br />
the rich that they ought to take care of the poor, and another<br />
thing to tell the poor that the rich ought to take care of them ".<br />
" A historian, he says, must possess gifts of imagination and<br />
;<br />
what is rarer still, he must forbear to abuse them ".<br />
" With<br />
the genius for producing a great historical romance, he must