25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 DESCRIPTION OF GENERAL SOCIETY. 1849-1872.<br />

His remarks (Autobiography, p. 227)<br />

as to his <strong>with</strong>drawal<br />

.from general society, at the close of the political decade, 1830-<br />

40, have naturally exposed him to pretty sharp criticism.<br />

&quot;<br />

General society, as now carried on in England, is so insipid<br />

an affair, even to the persons who make it what it is, that it is<br />

kept up for any reason rather than the pleasure &quot;;<br />

it affords and<br />

so on. It is difficult to recognize the appositeness of the<br />

censure. General society is a very large phrase ;<br />

it comprises<br />

coteries where such a man as <strong>Mill</strong> would be out of his element,<br />

and others where he might discuss any subject, and utter any<br />

opinions that he pleased.<br />

It was no doubt a saving of time to<br />

renounce going into society ; but it was accompanied <strong>with</strong><br />

some loss, for which he makes no allowance. There were<br />

other societies, besides the Political Economy Club, where he<br />

could have occasionally gone <strong>with</strong> considerable profit. Before<br />

hazarding all the opinions contained in the Essays on Religion,<br />

he would have done well to have discussed them <strong>with</strong> a variety<br />

of persons whom it would not be difficult to name.<br />

In expressing himself on matters that he very much disliked,<br />

he was at times exceedingly sharp and plain-spoken. One<br />

example is given by Mr. Holyoake,<br />

in connexion <strong>with</strong> the<br />

population question. In other cases, I have known him very<br />

unceremonious in his expressions of disapproval. I never had<br />

any occasion to complain of his manner, so far as I myself<br />

was concerned ; he was, on the contrary, unremittingly courteous<br />

as well as kind. But the things that he said to other people,<br />

made one feel that he might take a sudden and inexplicable<br />

turn. Then, it was a theory of his to be more frank and out<br />

spoken than the common notions of good-breeding would<br />

allow ; <strong>with</strong> this qualification, that he expected to be treated<br />

to the same frankness in return. We must carefully exonerate<br />

him from rudeness of language ; his refinement and tact were<br />

perfect ; he could clothe a very severe remark in an unexcep<br />

tionable form. For many years, he was wont to encourage<br />

young men to send him their productions for criticism and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!