John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
70 COMTE S WORK BROUGHT TO ENGLAND. 1841-1848.<br />
Without pursuing farther at present the fortunes of the Logic,<br />
I will allude to the connexion between <strong>Mill</strong> and Comte, and to<br />
the share that Comte had in shaping <strong>Mill</strong> s Political Philosophy.<br />
Wheatstone always claimed to be the means of introducing<br />
Comte in England. He brought over from Paris the two first<br />
volumes of the Philosophic Positive, after the publication of the<br />
second, which was in 1837. It would appear that the first<br />
volume, published by itself, in 1830, had fallen dead; not<strong>with</strong><br />
standing that the two first chapters really contained in very<br />
clear language, although <strong>with</strong>out expansion, the two great<br />
foundations that Comte built upon the Three Stages and the<br />
Hierarchy of the Sciences. Wheatstone mentioned the work<br />
to his scientific friends in London, and among others to<br />
Brewster, who was then a contributor of scientific articles to<br />
the Edinburgh<br />
as a good topic ;<br />
Review. Comte s volumes struck him at once<br />
and he wrote an article on them in the August<br />
number for 1838. Anyone knowing him would have predicted,<br />
as the strain of his review, an indignant or else a contemptuous<br />
exposure of the atheism, a fastening on the weak points in his<br />
own special subjects, as Optics, and a cold recognition of his<br />
systematic comprehensiveness. This, however, was to leave<br />
out of the account one element his antipathy to Whewell ;<br />
sufficiently marked in a review of the History of the Inductive<br />
Sciences in the previous year Brewster found <strong>with</strong> joy a<br />
number of observations on Hypothesis and other points, that<br />
he could turn against Whewell ; and the effect was, I have no<br />
doubt, to soften the adverse criticisms, and to produce an<br />
article on the whole favourable to the book, and one that even<br />
Comte himself regarded <strong>with</strong> some complacency. <strong>Mill</strong> got<br />
wind of the two volumes in the end of 1837, after he had<br />
completed the draft of his Book on Induction. The Autobio<br />
graphy gives (pp. 210-14) the general effect produced upon him<br />
by the whole work, which he perused <strong>with</strong> avidity as the<br />
successive volumes appeared ; but does not adequately express<br />
the influence in detail, nor the warmth of esteem and affection