John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES OF INDUCTION. 67<br />
their repute. An Aberdeen Lecturer on Chemistry, the late<br />
Dr. <strong>John</strong> Shier (Chemist to the Colony of Demarara), went<br />
carefully over all the chemical examples <strong>with</strong> me, and struck<br />
out various erroneous statements. I had recently made a study<br />
of Faraday s very stiff papers on Electricity, and from these I<br />
extracted one generalization, somewhat modified by myself,<br />
and this <strong>Mill</strong> prized very highly ; nevertheless, it was afterwards<br />
carped at by Whewell, as going beyond what Faraday would<br />
have allowed. One way or other, I gave him a large stock of<br />
examples to choose from,<br />
as he revised the Third Book for<br />
press. The difficulty that was most felt was to get .good<br />
examples of the purely _Experiinental Methods. He had<br />
availed himself of the famous research on Dew adduced by<br />
Herschel. There was hardly to be got any other example so<br />
good. For one of his later editions, I gave him the example<br />
from Brown-Sequard, on the cause of Cadaveric Rigidity, and<br />
also used it in my own book. For the Deductive Method, and<br />
the allied subjects of Explanation and Empirical and Derivative<br />
Laws, the examples that we found were abundant. When,<br />
however, I suggested his adopting some from Psychology, he<br />
steadily, and I believe wisely, resisted ; and, if he took any of<br />
these, it was in the Deductive department.<br />
I was so much struck <strong>with</strong> the view of Induction that re<br />
that I<br />
garded it as reasoning from particulars to particulars,<br />
suggested a farther exemplification of it in detail, and he<br />
inserted two pages of instances that I gave him. On the three<br />
last books, 1 had little to offer. I remember his saying at a<br />
later period, that the Fourth Book (which I have always<br />
regarded as the crude materials of a Logic of Definition and<br />
Classification) was made up of a number of subjects that he<br />
did not know where to place.<br />
The Logic has been about the best attacked book of the<br />
time j and the author has in successive editions replied to<br />
objections and made extensive amendments. I have had<br />
myself full opportunities for expressing both agreements and