25.04.2013 Views

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVIEWS TENNYSON : DE TOCQUEVILLE. 47<br />

work as an enforcement of the radical creed. After Bentham<br />

and the <strong>Mill</strong>s, no man of their generation was better grounded<br />

in logical methods, or more thorough in his method of grap<br />

pling <strong>with</strong> political and other questions, than Samuel Bailey.<br />

In the same number, <strong>Mill</strong> reviews Tennyson s poems. He<br />

assigns as his inducement that the only influential organs that<br />

had as yet noticed them were Blackwood and the Quarterly<br />

Review ; on which notices he pronounces a decided and not<br />

very flattering opinion. He is, accordingly, one of the earliest<br />

to mete out justice to Tennyson s powers ; and, as a critical<br />

exercise, as well as a sympathetic appreciation, the article is<br />

highly meritorious. In some instances besides, <strong>Mill</strong> was<br />

among the first, if not the very first, to welcome a rising genius.<br />

He closes the number <strong>with</strong> a political article on the measures<br />

of the Government for the session, among others, the Irish<br />

Church and the Municipal Corporations bills. His text seems<br />

to be that the statesmen of the generation are good in destroy<br />

ing, but bad in construction ; and he says that the remark<br />

applies to all the Whig reforms, and most of all to Lord<br />

Brougham<br />

In the third number, Oct., 1835, <strong>Mill</strong> reviews De Tocque-<br />

s Law reforms.<br />

ville s book, which had then appeared ; the review extending<br />

to 45 pages. It is a very full account of the book, <strong>with</strong><br />

copious extracts, but may be considered as superseded by the<br />

article written for the Edinburgh Review in 1840, which is<br />

reprinted in the Dissertations. The number concludes <strong>with</strong> a<br />

short but energetic review of the Parliamentary session just<br />

concluded. It is of the tone and character of all his political<br />

writing in those years ; a retrospect of recent achievements,<br />

<strong>with</strong> a view of the present position and declaration of the one<br />

thing needful for it a leader. He bitterly complains<br />

absence of a man of action, and asks,<br />

&quot;<br />

Why<br />

of the<br />

does not Mr.<br />

Grote exert himself? There is not a man in Parliament who<br />

could do so much, or who is more thoroughly the people s<br />

&quot;<br />

friend.&quot; O Connell is the only figure that stands erect.&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!