John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REVIEWS TENNYSON : DE TOCQUEVILLE. 47<br />
work as an enforcement of the radical creed. After Bentham<br />
and the <strong>Mill</strong>s, no man of their generation was better grounded<br />
in logical methods, or more thorough in his method of grap<br />
pling <strong>with</strong> political and other questions, than Samuel Bailey.<br />
In the same number, <strong>Mill</strong> reviews Tennyson s poems. He<br />
assigns as his inducement that the only influential organs that<br />
had as yet noticed them were Blackwood and the Quarterly<br />
Review ; on which notices he pronounces a decided and not<br />
very flattering opinion. He is, accordingly, one of the earliest<br />
to mete out justice to Tennyson s powers ; and, as a critical<br />
exercise, as well as a sympathetic appreciation, the article is<br />
highly meritorious. In some instances besides, <strong>Mill</strong> was<br />
among the first, if not the very first, to welcome a rising genius.<br />
He closes the number <strong>with</strong> a political article on the measures<br />
of the Government for the session, among others, the Irish<br />
Church and the Municipal Corporations bills. His text seems<br />
to be that the statesmen of the generation are good in destroy<br />
ing, but bad in construction ; and he says that the remark<br />
applies to all the Whig reforms, and most of all to Lord<br />
Brougham<br />
In the third number, Oct., 1835, <strong>Mill</strong> reviews De Tocque-<br />
s Law reforms.<br />
ville s book, which had then appeared ; the review extending<br />
to 45 pages. It is a very full account of the book, <strong>with</strong><br />
copious extracts, but may be considered as superseded by the<br />
article written for the Edinburgh Review in 1840, which is<br />
reprinted in the Dissertations. The number concludes <strong>with</strong> a<br />
short but energetic review of the Parliamentary session just<br />
concluded. It is of the tone and character of all his political<br />
writing in those years ; a retrospect of recent achievements,<br />
<strong>with</strong> a view of the present position and declaration of the one<br />
thing needful for it a leader. He bitterly complains<br />
absence of a man of action, and asks,<br />
"<br />
Why<br />
of the<br />
does not Mr.<br />
Grote exert himself? There is not a man in Parliament who<br />
could do so much, or who is more thoroughly the people s<br />
"<br />
friend." O Connell is the only figure that stands erect."