04.06.2013 Views

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in resolving conflict and peace building or even hampering their<br />

humanitarian activities as a result.<br />

In Sudan, NGOs with clear political agendas have been<br />

proliferating and that can hinder conflict resolution and entangle<br />

the NGOs in the conflict (Riehl, 2001). NGOs have strong<br />

incentives to get involved politically because the political<br />

situation affects their ability to make headway with conflict<br />

resolution. Although giving aid appears to be a benign and<br />

benevolent activity, this aid can inadvertently perpetuate<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> conflict. Anderson (1999) argues that international<br />

humanitarian aid can negatively affect conflict in two main<br />

ways—it can either feed into tensions between groups or it can<br />

weaken existing connections between the groups. An example <strong>of</strong><br />

this would be targeting the aid to a particular group <strong>of</strong><br />

people—ethnic, religious, or some other group. If this group<br />

receives aid and another group with whom they have tensions<br />

doesn't receive aid, it can serve to reinforce those divisions.<br />

Anderson thus advocates that humanitarian aid needs to be given<br />

in a thoughtful way, including an analysis <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conflict and how existing institutions and norms either feed into<br />

the conflict or serve to mitigate it. NGOs need to be c<strong>are</strong>ful that<br />

any resulting aid will strengthen local capacities for peace and not<br />

serve to strength existing tensions and divisions.<br />

INGOs <strong>are</strong> the largest source <strong>of</strong> controversy when it comes to<br />

NGO involvement in conflict resolution. The other types <strong>of</strong> NGOs<br />

involved <strong>are</strong> much more limited in their reach and roles, and thus<br />

they do not have as big a problem with jeopardising their core<br />

missions through political involvement. The most dangerous<br />

thing for NGOs is when they try to engage in both hand-on and<br />

hands-<strong>of</strong>f methods <strong>of</strong> dealing with conflict resolutions. For<br />

example, trying to combine relief and advocacy can lead to<br />

jeopardising the neutrality that is so vital in relief work. Even<br />

combining policy work and empowerment/transformation<br />

activities can be difficult because then NGOs might be looked on<br />

as taking sides as well. There is definitely a need to re-look and<br />

probe into the proper relationship between NGO advocacy and<br />

NGO relief and services work to establish how a balance can be<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!