04.06.2013 Views

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the land US$750.00. Mudzi laid the condition that either Huni<br />

pays the money or vacates his stand. The chief's court dealing<br />

with the case resolved that Mudzi was at fault in selling farm land<br />

to Huni because the custodian <strong>of</strong> all rural land was the chief. The<br />

traditional court agreed that Mudzi pays back half the amount he<br />

had already received from Huni for land was not supposed to be<br />

bought and sold. The court told him that he had sold his<br />

homestead and the farmland was being repossessed by the chief<br />

who would distribute it to needy people. By selling the land Mudzi<br />

had shown that he did not need it. Mudzi reported the same case<br />

to the magistrates' court who told him that the chiefs' decision<br />

would stand because he (Mudzi) did not have title deeds to the<br />

land.<br />

Case 3 – Cattle graze in a crop field<br />

This was reported at chief Chounda's court. Jeremiah demanded<br />

a tonne <strong>of</strong> maize at harvest as compensation from Washaya after<br />

Washaya's cattle fed on his crops. The chief tasked a local<br />

Agriculture Research Extension (AREX) <strong>of</strong>ficer together with the<br />

chief's two selected elders to visit the field and assess the damage<br />

caused by Washaya's cattle. The verdict reached after the<br />

assessment was that Washaya would pay two bags <strong>of</strong> maize<br />

because the AREX <strong>of</strong>ficer alleged that the whole crop without<br />

being grazed would not yield a tonne.<br />

Case 4 – Adultery<br />

Mupona reported to the traditional court at chief Mazano that he<br />

caught Masango with his wife (Mupona's wife) in a compromising<br />

position in his garden. The garden is 200 metres away from<br />

Mupona's homestead. Mupona said he followed his wife to the<br />

garden when he thought she had stayed <strong>too</strong> long. He brought a<br />

pant to the court which he claimed was Masango's which he had<br />

left behind when he escaped from the garden in panic. Masango<br />

refuted the allegations vehemently and eloquently, pointing out<br />

that Mazano was fabricating. Mupona's wife also denied the<br />

allegations levelled by her husband. The traditional court<br />

dismissed the case as lacking in evidence. Masango threatened to<br />

report the accuser to the same court on allegations <strong>of</strong> soiling his<br />

name.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!