04.06.2013 Views

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In Rwanda for example, citizens could be compelled to participate<br />

in abunzi due to their social situation <strong>of</strong> poverty, limited<br />

education, powerlessness as well as lack <strong>of</strong> credible alternatives<br />

for justice. In addition, the abunzi mediation is mandated by the<br />

law. However, legalized mediation is not peculiar to Rwanda only;<br />

other countries including the United States <strong>of</strong> America also<br />

practise legalized mediation, which is <strong>of</strong>ten classified as a form <strong>of</strong><br />

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). However, state mandated<br />

mediation distorts the entire manner in which proper mediation<br />

is supposed to be experienced by <strong>actors</strong>. The government <strong>of</strong><br />

Rwanda has made it explicit in its laws on the abunzi that it<br />

expects a mediation process from the abunzi members. In other<br />

words, the culture <strong>of</strong> mediation is communicated by the law.<br />

Crimes and disputes <strong>of</strong> a particular nature <strong>are</strong> by law required to<br />

go to the abunzi for hearing before the primary courts can<br />

deliberate on the issue. Although the state-backed legal<br />

institutions <strong>of</strong> dispute resolution have filled a void in the justice<br />

<strong>are</strong>na, it is also arguable that the government <strong>of</strong> Rwanda is<br />

preoccupied with the creation <strong>of</strong> decentralized legal forums where<br />

people can access justice. However, the mandatory nature <strong>of</strong> such<br />

institutions makes the resultant reconciliation questionable.<br />

Citizens <strong>are</strong> obligated to use the mediation approach, while they<br />

<strong>are</strong> reminded <strong>of</strong> the punishment that will follow from the formal<br />

courts should the mediation efforts fail. The abunzi system is an<br />

apt demonstration <strong>of</strong> the tangled relationships between law,<br />

power and justice and how these cumulatively impact on the lives<br />

<strong>of</strong> ordinary Rwandans brought into contact with the state.<br />

Given the foregoing, the abunzi <strong>are</strong> an illustrative demonstration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dual impact <strong>of</strong> state-initiated systems <strong>of</strong> restorative justice.<br />

The abunzi system demonstrates a level <strong>of</strong> ambivalence when it<br />

comes to pursuance <strong>of</strong> the restorative and retributive approaches<br />

to justice. This is because the abunzi is a traditional system <strong>of</strong><br />

conflict resolution which was just transplanted into the formal<br />

legal system, and is still expected to exhibit a conciliatory<br />

approach. Although the Organic Law states that the abunzi <strong>are</strong><br />

supposed to use restorative approaches instead <strong>of</strong> the retributive<br />

approach, the reality is such that this institution can also exhibit<br />

adversarial tendencies. Participants in mediation process <strong>are</strong><br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!