04.06.2013 Views

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> ukulagisa became a thorny issue as it was a perennial source <strong>of</strong><br />

conflict between surrounding livestock owners and the local<br />

authority.<br />

It is therefore instructive for project designers to thoroughly<br />

analyse the project cycle for sources <strong>of</strong> possible negative impact to<br />

both the project and the beneficiaries. Also communities need to<br />

be thoroughly prep<strong>are</strong>d to embrace changes that <strong>are</strong> going to<br />

occur in their lifestyles as a result <strong>of</strong> the project. This should not<br />

only involve taking host communities through a change<br />

management training exercise but also a full disclosure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

potential positives and negatives <strong>of</strong> the project to their lives so<br />

that informed consent for the project is obtained.<br />

Community compliance or community participation?<br />

The cornerstone <strong>of</strong> community-based development initiatives is<br />

the active involvement <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a defined community in at<br />

least some aspects <strong>of</strong> project design and implementation<br />

(Mansuri and Rao, 2004). CBRNM projects <strong>are</strong> usually conceived<br />

outside host communities and sold to these communities through<br />

ill prep<strong>are</strong>d and ill administered participatory techniques. This is<br />

why these projects have high sounding acronyms such as<br />

WINDFALL, CAMPFIRE and LIFE (Living in a finite environment),<br />

clear products <strong>of</strong> academic minds outside host communities.<br />

Communities <strong>are</strong> only brought in to legitimize an already<br />

conceived and funded project with project facilitators shaping<br />

and directing participatory exercises and community “needs” <strong>are</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>ten shaped by perceptions <strong>of</strong> what the project can deliver and<br />

thus outside agendas get expressed as local knowledge (Mansuri<br />

and Rao, 2004). Some ethnic groups such as the Tonga have<br />

been sidelined in much <strong>of</strong> the decision-making processes <strong>of</strong><br />

CBRNM projects, even though they <strong>are</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten the original<br />

inhabitants <strong>of</strong> these remote <strong>are</strong>as (Frost and Bond, 2007). Host<br />

communities need to be afforded a chance for real participation<br />

where they <strong>are</strong> fully informed <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the project and<br />

they make inputs into the formulation and conceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />

the project not just pseudo participation designed to fulfil donor<br />

requirements and a way <strong>of</strong> leading communities into a finished<br />

product. Giving host communities a voice during project<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!