04.06.2013 Views

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Outcomes <strong>of</strong> the reported cases<br />

Rusenza implicated in Case 1 contested the chief's verdict at the<br />

Bindura magistrates' court. The court had a different view on the<br />

case, that is, to stop beliefs in witchcraft by punishing those who<br />

would have labelled others as witches. Resultantly the chief and<br />

Rusenza's son were summoned to answer allegations <strong>of</strong> violating<br />

Part V1 Chapter V <strong>of</strong> the Witchcraft Suppression Act which<br />

explains that to “accuse a person <strong>of</strong> witchcraft means to indicate<br />

that the person is possessed by a spirit or used non-natural<br />

means to cause the death, injury, disease, or inability in any<br />

person'' (Law society <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe, 2009). The dilemma in this<br />

issue is that witchcraft is not an <strong>are</strong>a that can be scrutinized; it is<br />

not easy to verify an evil spell because it's a matter <strong>of</strong> spiritual<br />

belief not <strong>of</strong> empirical evidence. Unfortunately, before the<br />

magistrate's court day, unknown persons set Rusenza's<br />

homestead on fire. She escaped death by a whisker but lost all her<br />

belongings in the inferno. Through fear, Rusenza withdrew the<br />

case from the magistrates' court. Commenting on the mysterious<br />

fire in an interview with the researcher the chief said Rusenza was<br />

facing the wrath <strong>of</strong> ancestors as she disobeyed the chief's orders.<br />

He castigated the courts for continuously clinging to the colonial<br />

era restrictions on the practice <strong>of</strong> witchcraft. When contacted for<br />

comment, Rusenza thought her home was burnt by the chief's<br />

aides as punishment for reporting the chief to court.<br />

A follow up was made to solicit the feelings <strong>of</strong> Mupona since he<br />

had lost the case. He dismissed the chief's court as “a good for<br />

nothing group who depend on money given to them by corrupt<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenders''. He expressed dissatisfaction on how his case was<br />

handled. He reiterated that it was likely that Masango had paid<br />

some bribe. He even dismissed the idea <strong>of</strong> reporting his case to<br />

another chief pointing out that they <strong>are</strong> all the same. “These chiefs<br />

<strong>are</strong> to be vetted before they <strong>are</strong> installed to chieftainship because<br />

some <strong>of</strong> them <strong>are</strong> criminals themselves”, echoed Mupona in an<br />

interview with the researcher.<br />

Although the cases reported above <strong>are</strong> unique in nature, the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> conflict transformation applied is the same. In each<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!