04.06.2013 Views

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

Beneficiaries are actors too.pdf - Southern Institute of Peace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

must be recognised if it is to be integrated with the global<br />

knowledge. Certain IK practices become outmoded because <strong>of</strong><br />

rapid changes in the environment or the socio-economic and<br />

cultural scene. Not all IK practices <strong>are</strong> naturally in harmony with<br />

the environment. Thus it is imperative to move away from the<br />

misconception that all IK is good and vital for sustainable<br />

development.<br />

There is historical and contemporary evidence that indigenous<br />

peoples have also committed environmental wrongs through<br />

over-grazing, over-hunting, or over cultivation <strong>of</strong> the land and it is<br />

misleading to think <strong>of</strong> IK as always being “good”, “right” or<br />

“sustainable”. In particular, IK relating to cultural artefacts,<br />

totems, rules and taboos, beliefs and prohibitions may require<br />

critical examination. For instance, where perhaps in some distant<br />

past there was need for people to hold that women and children<br />

should not eat chicken or eggs, it is questionable whether that<br />

prohibition is justified today. The same goes for the tradition,<br />

common in many tribes, which specifies which parts <strong>of</strong> an animal<br />

or chicken, can be eaten by men, women and children<br />

respectively. Many <strong>of</strong> the taboos, rules and prohibition seem to<br />

have been overtaken by time and <strong>are</strong> no longer serving a useful<br />

purpose nor rational. However, in critically re-examining those<br />

beliefs it is always useful to bear in mind their purpose, rather<br />

than their grounding. For example, among the communities in<br />

western Kenya every young boy in the village was restrained from<br />

killing frogs by creating the fear that his mother's breasts would<br />

disintegrate if he did so. The logic <strong>of</strong> this prohibition is faulty, but<br />

its purpose is sound since frogs needed to be protected to avoid<br />

extinction as they were valued by the communities for some forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> traditional medicine. IK is dynamic and evolves all the time.<br />

However, Thrupp (1989) has noted how sometimes IK that was<br />

once well-adapted and effective for securing a livelihood in a<br />

particular environment becomes inappropriate under conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental degradation and when change is particularly<br />

rapid or drastic, the knowledge associated with them may be<br />

rendered unsuitable and possibly damaging in the altered<br />

conditions.<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!