boylistad

S
In the above discussion the current was determined before the voltages
of the network were determined. There is, however, a method
referred to as the voltage divider rule (VDR) that permits determining
the voltage levels without first finding the current. The rule can be
derived by analyzing the network of Fig. 5.26.
RT � R1 � R2 E
and I � �� R
Applying Ohm’s law:
E
V1 � IR1 �� �� R �R1 � �
T
R1
RT
E
with V2 � IR2 �� �� R �R2 � �
T
R2
RT
Note that the format for V 1 and V 2 is
T
E
�
E
�
(voltage divider rule) (5.10)
where Vx is the voltage across Rx, E is the impressed voltage across the
series elements, and RT is the total resistance of the series circuit.
In words, the voltage divider rule states that
the voltage across a resistor in a series circuit is equal to the value of
that resistor times the total impressed voltage across the series
elements divided by the total resistance of the series elements.
EXAMPLE 5.10 Determine the voltage V1 for the network of Fig.
5.27.
Solution: Eq. (5.10):
V1 � � R1E
R (20 �)(64 V) 1280 V
� �� 1E
��� ���16 V
R R1 � R2 20 ��60 � 80
T
Vx � � RxE
�
R
T
EXAMPLE 5.11 Using the voltage divider rule, determine the voltages
V1 and V3 for the series circuit of Fig. 5.28.
Solution:
V1 � � R1E
� � �
RT
� � �6 V
V3 � � R3E
(8 � 10
� � �
RT
360 V
���24 V
15
3 (2 � 10 90 V
�
15
(8 k�)(45 V)
�)(45 V)
�� ��3
15 k� 15 � 10 �
3 (2 k�)(45 V) (2 k�)(45 V)
��� ��
2 k��5 k��8 k� 15 k�
�)(45 V)
��3
15 � 10 �
The rule can be extended to the voltage across two or more series
elements if the resistance in the numerator of Eq. (5.10) is expanded to
E
VOLTAGE DIVIDER RULE ⏐⏐⏐ 139
E
I
R T
R 1
R 2
V 1
V 2
FIG. 5.26
Developing the voltage divider rule.
64 V
+ V1 –
20 �
R 1
FIG. 5.27
Example 5.10.
60 �
R 2
+
+
+
R1 2 k� V1 –
V'
E
–
45 V R2 5 k�
–
R3 +
8 k� V3 –
FIG. 5.28
Example 5.11.
+
–
+
–