Effects of reduced plant height on breeding requirements and ...

latlê 28. Nltrogen ¡'ertlllrer Appllcatlon Study, ANOVA for Tesr lJetghr.
Repllcates
13.53
3,58
1.16
8.20
3.04
8.05
0.48
0.19
¡.5.67**
54.l2ttr.
4
5.19
l2
¡ertÍ1lu erê (¡)
lrro¡ (a)
9.38
1.34
1. 3l
1.76
7.48*t
L1 .94r,).
28.17'rir
4.46*
51.16¡t*
. 0.49
Cenotypes (G)
0.48
I rarl6 vs se¡Ì.1-clq7ârts
0.34
40.87ti*
74.90**
0.36
L7 .42
4 ,49
10,20,r*
31.24r,tt
. Bonerza vs C702O24
8,10!¡
2.03
5.78¡t
I06.28¡r¡t
Bonênzâ vs C703011
r.60
I 67.08**
. 27.89**
16,13:r¡i
t.94
6.40
3onånza vs C703032
4.23
t6.77**
8,84.*'t
2.40
0.03
Bonanza vs Miû¡64-62
3.39*¡t
10,38*
Fxc
0,67
0,44
0.5 7
Coefficlent <strong>of</strong> varlablllty 7,
(1) Error(a) 3.8
(2) Error(b)
2,2 1.8 1.8 4,7
3.6
x F signifÍcant at ?=0.05.
** I¿ signlficånt at p-0.01.
f slngl-e degree <strong>of</strong> freedom comparf6on5 are orthogonal, but not all fÌo¡n the ssûê Eutuâlly orthogonal set.