Effects of reduced plant height on breeding requirements and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...$

Table I0. Phenotyplc correlaËions, ExperímenL L Population Characteristícs C-70-I C-70-2 C-70-3 Pooled Correlated n=103. n=87 n=41 Correlatíon PLant Height (cn. ) !,7ith: Yiêld (kg. /ha. ) Kernels/splke 200 Kernel weight (g,) TesÈ weight (ke, /hl. ) Z Plunpness Days Èo heading Days to Daturity Days in post-aíthesis Degree <strong>of</strong> lodging Level <strong>of</strong> c-amylase Saccharifying acÊíviÈy 7" Bati'ey nltrogen . Solublearnino-nitrogen Yíeld (kg. /ha. ) with: KerneLs/spike 200 KerneL r,¡eight (g. ) Test r^'eight (kC. /h1. ) % Plumpness Days Èo heading Days to maturíty Days in post-ânLheais Degree <strong>of</strong> lodging Level <strong>of</strong> a-amylase Saccharifying activíty "Á Baxley nitrogen Soluble arnino-nitrogen Kernel-s/spíke with: 200 Kernel weíght (g. ) Test l,¡eighr (kg, /h1. ) Z Plumpness Ðays to heading Days to maturity Days in post-anthesis Degree <strong>of</strong> T,odging Level <strong>of</strong> q-amylase Saccharifying activiLy % Barley nitrogen Soluble amino-nitrogen * Sígnificant at P=0.05 ** Signifícant at P=0.01 .35** . 3l?** .18 -,07 .32*x ,46** ,40,r* ,3I** .23* .40'k¡t -.55'k* -.16 . -" 31.rt* .O7 .30** .32** .51**. .46¡t* .04 -.20* . 13 .16 -.01 .20* =.07 -,zlx .22x .19 .03 .t2 -34** -12 .10 -.01 -,38** -.16 -.16 -.L2 .31** .05 .24** .30** -.08 -.18 -.07 . . -.2r* -.40** -.2O* -.25* -.t6 -.I9 -.25¿- -.04 -.29** -.33** -. 28x -.13 .13 .r4 .20 .30ii* -.01 .33tr* .2Ix -.O7 -.23* -.08 -.24* -.27x* _.26* -.33** -.20 .46*x .29 .5lt* .54** .59** -.69f¡'* -.06 .35* . 5 6,q* -, 09 -.20 -.2t . -.t2 .32J. .04 .11 .15 -. 39* .2! .41'r* -.13 -.zL -,42** - .08 -. 19 .02 - t?, .L7 .30 .LJ .06 -. J.f ^ -. 36* - .11 68 .354** 11+ .405** -397 ** .371** H lt ' .319¡r* .500** -. 080 - ,090 .040 -.L29 ..226* .070 .2L6** .060 -. 300** - ,080 .236'\* . 291** - .rz9 -.!49* -. 336** -.187** -.2L6*x - r 20 -.219** -.050 . 168* "187t *. .270** -.110 - .190x* -. 280'!* -.250*,t Cont I d. H = Ileterogereous correlations, Èherefore could not coEpute pooJ-ed value.
Table 10. (Cortínued) Châracteristics Correlated 200 Kernel r¡Teight (9. ) r^rirh : Test r,reight (kC. /h1, ) % Plumpness Days Ëo heading Days to maturíty Days ín post-anthesis Degree <strong>of</strong> lodging Level <strong>of</strong> o-amylase Saccharífying activity "l Barley nitrogen Soluble amino-nitrogen Test \a'eight (kC. /hl, ) Z Plumpness Days to headíng Days to maËurity Days in post-anthesis Degree <strong>of</strong> lodging Level <strong>of</strong> o,-amylase Saccharifying actíviÈy % Bar1ey nitrogen Soluble amino-nitrogen % Plumpness with: Dâys to heading Days to mâturíty Days in post-anthesís Degree <strong>of</strong> lodging Level <strong>of</strong> c-amylase Saccharifying actívity % Barley nitrogen Soluble amÍno-nitrogen Days to heading with: Days to maturíËy Days in post-anthesís 69 PoDulation c-70-L Cliõi-----õ17õ-T- poore¿ n=103 n=87 n=41 Corre l ¡i-i on .25* .55r.'* .75'k* ,79*,\ -.41** -.50*'t -.07 -.20 .41*'r .49*r. .28*x .41** -.26** -. 30r.r( -. 18 -. 09 .13 .25x -.22x -.21x . 30*'{ .59** -.51'kr. -. 39** _. 48r.* _.28* .13 .22x .11 .20 -.04 -.45rt* . 13 -.31** .02 .2t* -.t4 -,27* -.35'rrk _ .44*'\ -.20* -. 10 .20* .44x* . 01 . 34rk* -. 05 - ,44,\* -.01 - ,25x .45'k* .2L* -.01 -,32** .61** .71** -.50*'e -.56rk* .60'l't .83,t* - .42** .05 .32* - ,)^ -.00 -.04 -. 08 .64iß* -. 35'k -.04 .18 -.2t -.11 -.13 -.10 -.62x* -.01 .38** .56r.'t -. 31'k .03 .09 -.12 .29 -. 31* ä .7 82** - .446** -. 100 ,422*x .345** -.264x* -.rt9 . r49x - . 19 7.'.* H - .438/.* H . 178*'t Days to maturity r,rith: Dâys in post-anthesís .32** . 13 .82** .380'krk v. siàãi- ** Sígnificant at P=0.01 fH = Ileterogeneous correlations, therefore could not compute pooled value, H H .070 -. 187** - .438't* -.r29 ,327 ** H H -.010 . 310 r. r( - . r49* H -. 495**
Page 1 and 2:
University of Mani
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWI,EDGMENTS It has been a grea
Page 5 and 6:
ÎABI,E OF TONTENTS av írÞâ dô
Page 7 and 8:
Þâ o-â r Days to l'{aturity ....
Page 9 and 10:
vaal ËÞe rro Days to Heading . ".
Page 11 and 12:
SUGGÊSTIONSFORFIIIURSRESEÀRCH ,.,
Page 13 and 14:
11. Nitrogen Fertil-izer Applicatio
Page 15 and 16:
TABT-,8 42, 43, I+4, r+5. 46. 48. 4
Page 17 and 18:
74. 75" ?6, 77, 78,. 79, 80. 81" 82
Page 19 and 20:
xvii i occurred for yield, but the
Page 21 and 22:
I]TERATURE REVIEW Semi-dwarf Growth
Page 23 and 24:
In the United States the barley bre
Page 25 and 26:
Tabl-e 1. Broad Sense Ileritability
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2. Broad Sense Heritability E
Page 29 and 30:
wíth yield. fhis group discussed t
Page 31 and 32:
ship in common wheat. 0n the other
Page 33 and 34:
c onpared 'r . Two other important
Page 35 and 36: eported a non-significant positive
Page 37 and 38: majority of studie
Page 39 and 40: correfation between diastatic power
Page 41 and 42: extent. Frey et al-. (1951) indicat
Page 43 and 44: seni-dwarf wheats to nitrogen ferti
Page 45 and 46: number of spíkes
Page 47 and 48: Stanberry and Lowrey (L965) reporte
Page 49 and 50: Íright be of grea
Page 51 and 52: from varyíng seeding rates in barl
Page 53 and 54: Reports on the effect of</s
Page 55 and 56: the effect of seed
Page 57 and 58: l,upton et 41. (7974) pointed out t
Page 59 and 60: Table 3. Pedigrees of</stro
Page 61 and 62: (4) 200 Kernel weight * record.ed i
Page 63 and 64: population, using individual line m
Page 65 and 66: Site Sanford 19?6 Clay Cawnan 19?6
Page 67 and 68: Orthogonal single degree of
Page 69 and 70: Experiment lV: _-.t0qlepptite lenet
Page 71 and 72: ferences between genotype s which w
Page 73 and 74: and plant
Page 75 and 76: Table 7. con¡tonêlts of</
Page 77 and 78: was significant" fhe only case in w
Page 79 and 80: (28 to 5B/"), as reported by nost o
Page 81 and 82: Table 8. Continued Range Lor{est Li
Page 83 and 84: the Highest Yielding l,ines within
Page 85: Phenot:'¡pic Corre-Lations Sinpl-e
Page 89 and 90: did Syme (f972), Fonseca and patter
Page 91 and 92: significant negative correlation wi
Page 93 and 94: elãted negative association betwee
Page 95 and 96: Aglononie ChArae'qeri s! ic s Pl"an
Page 97 and 98: Table 12. N1Ërogen FertLlizer Àpp
Page 99 and 100: Teble 14. NltrogeÍ FertLlLzêr ApP
Page 101 and 102: Table 15. NíËrogen ¡'ertil,izer
Page 103 and 104: lable 16. Nltrogen Fertlllzer Appll
Page 105 and 106: freedom comparison indicated lqínn
Page 107 and 108: lab1e 19. Nftrogen trertÍlizer Áp
Page 109 and 110: Tâble 20, Nltrogei¡ FeltLltzêr A
Page 111 and 112: TabIe 22, Nltrogen Fertillzer Appli
Page 113 and 114: Table 23. Nitrogen Fertilizer Appl
Page 115 and 116: TabLe 25. Nltrogen Fefttlizef Appll
Page 117 and 118: itable 26. Nitrogen Fertfllzer Appl
Page 119 and 120: latlê 28. Nltrogen ¡'ertlllrer Ap
Page 121 and 122: Sanford â.nd Carnan, 1926, Since N
Page 123 and 124: Tabl-e 31 . Nítrogen Fertilizer Ap
Page 125 and 126: Îable33. Nítrogen Fertllizer Appl
Page 127 and 128: Table 34. Nitrogen Fertilfzer Appli
Page 129 and 130: îab1ê 36. NLtrogeî Fertl,LLzer A
Page 131 and 132: Table 38. Nitrogen Fertllizer Appli
Page 133 and 134: lab1e 39,. NLtrogen Fertllf¿er App
Page 135 and 136: Table 41. Nitïogen Iertillzer Appl
Page 137 and 138:
Table 42. Nitrogen Fertllizer Appli
Page 139 and 140:
'IabLe 44. Nítrogen ¡'ertilizer A
Page 141 and 142:
Q UAT,TTY Cltq.RÀcTER rsrf ts Q ua
Page 143 and 144:
lable 47. Nitrogen ¡'ertilLzer App
Page 145 and 146:
Table 49. Nltrogen ferrlllzer AppLl
Page 147 and 148:
îhe F x G i.nteraction at portage
Page 149 and 150:
fable 52, Nltrogen Fertfllze¡ Appl
Page 151 and 152:
'labLe 54- Seedlng Råte - Row Spac
Page 153 and 154:
Table 55. Seeding Rate - Ror'7 Spac
Page 155 and 156:
Table 57. Seeding Rate - Roúr Spac
Page 157 and 158:
while the tall sho\^/ed virtually n
Page 159 and 160:
Table 59. Seedlûg Rate - Row Spacl
Page 161 and 162:
Table 60. Seedlng Rate - Row Spacin
Page 163 and 164:
Table 61. Seedlng Rate - RotT Spaci
Page 165 and 166:
Table 62, SeedLng Rate - Rorar Spac
Page 167 and 168:
?áble 64. Seedlng Rare - Ror.r Spa
Page 169 and 170:
Table 65. SeedÍng Rate - Row Spaci
Page 171 and 172:
Table 67. Seedfng Rate - Row Spací
Page 173 and 174:
Table 68. AN0VA for Coleoptile Leng
Page 175 and 176:
'Iable 72. Means for Experíment IV
Page 177 and 178:
Table 73. (Continued ) B Variables
Page 179 and 180:
'IabLe 74' Ranks of</strong
Page 181 and 182:
Table 76. cenotype Means for Root D
Page 183 and 184:
fabTe ?6 Cid not indicate this diff
Page 185 and 186:
Table 79. Ranks of
Page 187 and 188:
Tabl"e 81. ANOVA for Number <strong
Page 189 and 190:
the second v¡as not significant (f
Page 191 and 192:
Table 85. Mean Numbers of</
Page 193 and 194:
of two locations f
Page 195 and 196:
have increased the precision <stron
Page 197 and 198:
showed no environmental interaction
Page 199 and 200:
yield testlng experiments. Furtherm
Page 201 and 202:
could in part account for the poor
Page 203 and 204:
signlficant, the correl_ations were
Page 205 and 206:
height and the qua
Page 207 and 208:
trial period. The area in which the
Page 209 and 210:
any specific cross. However, they d
Page 211 and 212:
as strong nor as consl-stent as is
Page 213 and 214:
with several critical agronomic par
Page 215 and 216:
maturity and days in post-anthesis
Page 217 and 218:
significantry rerated to several ot
Page 219 and 220:
icularly when nore optimum growing
Page 221 and 222:
would be useful to know the rerativ
Page 223 and 224:
Kernel Weight Added N had little ef
Page 225 and 226:
much as the tall genotypes. Also th
Page 227 and 228:
îhe effects of N
Page 229 and 230:
with the overall results of
Page 231 and 232:
Phenotypicaì.J_y novel gernplasm,
Page 233 and 234:
drastícaIIy changed phenotype as t
Page 235 and 236:
should not be recomnended for produ
Page 237 and 238:
One of the problem
Page 239 and 240:
The associatíon between root growt
Page 241 and 242:
GENER¡.L DTSCUSS]ON Since desired
Page 243 and 244:
inheríted" observation of<
Page 245 and 246:
indicated by this study suggests th
Page 247 and 248:
individual lines. It is generally c
Page 249 and 250:
sístent suppLy of
Page 251 and 252:
possibílity of ir
Page 253 and 254:
Testing et one site for one year wa
Page 255 and 256:
height genotJpes t
Page 257 and 258:
ïn terms of the o
Page 259 and 260:
Concern has been expressed by dryla
Page 261 and 262:
), +. ( 6, 7, Attempts should be ma
Page 263 and 264:
Beech' D.F" and M.J.T, Norman. 196g
Page 265 and 266:
Day, A.D, and R.K. Thonpson, 1970.
Page 267 and 268:
Guitard, 4,4., J.A. Neûrnan, and p
Page 269 and 270:
Konishi, T. L976. The nature and ch
Page 271 and 272:
Pawlisch, P.E., and H.L. shandp. Lg
Page 273 and 274:
Sisler, I^I.I^I, and p.J. Olsen. 19
Page 275 and 276:
trIoodward, R.trI. 7956. The effect
Page 277 and 278:
Appetrdr*' cenotvprc ìlêans fot j
Page 279 and 280:
^ppendlx conrlnue¿- Genotype Plán
Page 281 and 282:
.9anul¡uor xlpuâd¡¡V ezro tzz ,
Page 283 and 284:
^pIe¡¡¿tx conrtnued. Solu It lß
Page 285:
¿\tÎen¿lr conÈtnu€d, .,¡ÃE
show all

Effects of reduced plant height on breeding requirements and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?