- Page 1 and 2:
University of Mani
- Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWI,EDGMENTS It has been a grea
- Page 5 and 6:
ÎABI,E OF TONTENTS av írÞâ dô
- Page 7 and 8:
Þâ o-â r Days to l'{aturity ....
- Page 9 and 10:
vaal ËÞe rro Days to Heading . ".
- Page 11 and 12:
SUGGÊSTIONSFORFIIIURSRESEÀRCH ,.,
- Page 13 and 14:
11. Nitrogen Fertil-izer Applicatio
- Page 15 and 16:
TABT-,8 42, 43, I+4, r+5. 46. 48. 4
- Page 17 and 18:
74. 75" ?6, 77, 78,. 79, 80. 81" 82
- Page 19 and 20:
xvii i occurred for yield, but the
- Page 21 and 22:
I]TERATURE REVIEW Semi-dwarf Growth
- Page 23 and 24:
In the United States the barley bre
- Page 25 and 26:
Tabl-e 1. Broad Sense Ileritability
- Page 27 and 28:
Table 2. Broad Sense Heritability E
- Page 29 and 30:
wíth yield. fhis group discussed t
- Page 31 and 32:
ship in common wheat. 0n the other
- Page 33 and 34:
c onpared 'r . Two other important
- Page 35 and 36:
eported a non-significant positive
- Page 37 and 38:
majority of studie
- Page 39 and 40:
correfation between diastatic power
- Page 41 and 42:
extent. Frey et al-. (1951) indicat
- Page 43 and 44:
seni-dwarf wheats to nitrogen ferti
- Page 45 and 46:
number of spíkes
- Page 47 and 48:
Stanberry and Lowrey (L965) reporte
- Page 49 and 50:
Íright be of grea
- Page 51 and 52:
from varyíng seeding rates in barl
- Page 53 and 54:
Reports on the effect of</s
- Page 55 and 56:
the effect of seed
- Page 57 and 58:
l,upton et 41. (7974) pointed out t
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 3. Pedigrees of</stro
- Page 61 and 62:
(4) 200 Kernel weight * record.ed i
- Page 63 and 64:
population, using individual line m
- Page 65 and 66:
Site Sanford 19?6 Clay Cawnan 19?6
- Page 67 and 68:
Orthogonal single degree of
- Page 69 and 70:
Experiment lV: _-.t0qlepptite lenet
- Page 71 and 72:
ferences between genotype s which w
- Page 73 and 74:
and plant
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 7. con¡tonêlts of</
- Page 77 and 78:
was significant" fhe only case in w
- Page 79 and 80:
(28 to 5B/"), as reported by nost o
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 8. Continued Range Lor{est Li
- Page 83 and 84:
the Highest Yielding l,ines within
- Page 85 and 86:
Phenot:'¡pic Corre-Lations Sinpl-e
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 10. (Cortínued) Châracteris
- Page 89 and 90:
did Syme (f972), Fonseca and patter
- Page 91 and 92:
significant negative correlation wi
- Page 93 and 94:
elãted negative association betwee
- Page 95 and 96:
Aglononie ChArae'qeri s! ic s Pl"an
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 12. N1Ërogen FertLlizer Àpp
- Page 99 and 100:
Teble 14. NltrogeÍ FertLlLzêr ApP
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 15. NíËrogen ¡'ertil,izer
- Page 103 and 104:
lable 16. Nltrogen Fertlllzer Appll
- Page 105 and 106:
freedom comparison indicated lqínn
- Page 107 and 108:
lab1e 19. Nftrogen trertÍlizer Áp
- Page 109 and 110:
Tâble 20, Nltrogei¡ FeltLltzêr A
- Page 111 and 112:
TabIe 22, Nltrogen Fertillzer Appli
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 23. Nitrogen Fertilizer Appl
- Page 115 and 116:
TabLe 25. Nltrogen Fefttlizef Appll
- Page 117 and 118:
itable 26. Nitrogen Fertfllzer Appl
- Page 119 and 120:
latlê 28. Nltrogen ¡'ertlllrer Ap
- Page 121 and 122:
Sanford â.nd Carnan, 1926, Since N
- Page 123 and 124:
Tabl-e 31 . Nítrogen Fertilizer Ap
- Page 125 and 126:
Îable33. Nítrogen Fertllizer Appl
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 34. Nitrogen Fertilfzer Appli
- Page 129 and 130:
îab1ê 36. NLtrogeî Fertl,LLzer A
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 38. Nitrogen Fertllizer Appli
- Page 133 and 134:
lab1e 39,. NLtrogen Fertllf¿er App
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 41. Nitïogen Iertillzer Appl
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 42. Nitrogen Fertllizer Appli
- Page 139 and 140:
'IabLe 44. Nítrogen ¡'ertilizer A
- Page 141 and 142:
Q UAT,TTY Cltq.RÀcTER rsrf ts Q ua
- Page 143 and 144:
lable 47. Nitrogen ¡'ertilLzer App
- Page 145 and 146: Table 49. Nltrogen ferrlllzer AppLl
- Page 147 and 148: îhe F x G i.nteraction at portage
- Page 149 and 150: fable 52, Nltrogen Fertfllze¡ Appl
- Page 151 and 152: 'labLe 54- Seedlng Råte - Row Spac
- Page 153 and 154: Table 55. Seeding Rate - Ror'7 Spac
- Page 155 and 156: Table 57. Seeding Rate - Roúr Spac
- Page 157 and 158: while the tall sho\^/ed virtually n
- Page 159 and 160: Table 59. Seedlûg Rate - Row Spacl
- Page 161 and 162: Table 60. Seedlng Rate - Row Spacin
- Page 163 and 164: Table 61. Seedlng Rate - RotT Spaci
- Page 165 and 166: Table 62, SeedLng Rate - Rorar Spac
- Page 167 and 168: ?áble 64. Seedlng Rare - Ror.r Spa
- Page 169 and 170: Table 65. SeedÍng Rate - Row Spaci
- Page 171 and 172: Table 67. Seedfng Rate - Row Spací
- Page 173 and 174: Table 68. AN0VA for Coleoptile Leng
- Page 175 and 176: 'Iable 72. Means for Experíment IV
- Page 177 and 178: Table 73. (Continued ) B Variables
- Page 179 and 180: 'IabLe 74' Ranks of</strong
- Page 181 and 182: Table 76. cenotype Means for Root D
- Page 183 and 184: fabTe ?6 Cid not indicate this diff
- Page 185 and 186: Table 79. Ranks of
- Page 187 and 188: Tabl"e 81. ANOVA for Number <strong
- Page 189 and 190: the second v¡as not significant (f
- Page 191 and 192: Table 85. Mean Numbers of</
- Page 193 and 194: of two locations f
- Page 195: have increased the precision <stron
- Page 199 and 200: yield testlng experiments. Furtherm
- Page 201 and 202: could in part account for the poor
- Page 203 and 204: signlficant, the correl_ations were
- Page 205 and 206: height and the qua
- Page 207 and 208: trial period. The area in which the
- Page 209 and 210: any specific cross. However, they d
- Page 211 and 212: as strong nor as consl-stent as is
- Page 213 and 214: with several critical agronomic par
- Page 215 and 216: maturity and days in post-anthesis
- Page 217 and 218: significantry rerated to several ot
- Page 219 and 220: icularly when nore optimum growing
- Page 221 and 222: would be useful to know the rerativ
- Page 223 and 224: Kernel Weight Added N had little ef
- Page 225 and 226: much as the tall genotypes. Also th
- Page 227 and 228: îhe effects of N
- Page 229 and 230: with the overall results of
- Page 231 and 232: Phenotypicaì.J_y novel gernplasm,
- Page 233 and 234: drastícaIIy changed phenotype as t
- Page 235 and 236: should not be recomnended for produ
- Page 237 and 238: One of the problem
- Page 239 and 240: The associatíon between root growt
- Page 241 and 242: GENER¡.L DTSCUSS]ON Since desired
- Page 243 and 244: inheríted" observation of<
- Page 245 and 246: indicated by this study suggests th
- Page 247 and 248:
individual lines. It is generally c
- Page 249 and 250:
sístent suppLy of
- Page 251 and 252:
possibílity of ir
- Page 253 and 254:
Testing et one site for one year wa
- Page 255 and 256:
height genotJpes t
- Page 257 and 258:
ïn terms of the o
- Page 259 and 260:
Concern has been expressed by dryla
- Page 261 and 262:
), +. ( 6, 7, Attempts should be ma
- Page 263 and 264:
Beech' D.F" and M.J.T, Norman. 196g
- Page 265 and 266:
Day, A.D, and R.K. Thonpson, 1970.
- Page 267 and 268:
Guitard, 4,4., J.A. Neûrnan, and p
- Page 269 and 270:
Konishi, T. L976. The nature and ch
- Page 271 and 272:
Pawlisch, P.E., and H.L. shandp. Lg
- Page 273 and 274:
Sisler, I^I.I^I, and p.J. Olsen. 19
- Page 275 and 276:
trIoodward, R.trI. 7956. The effect
- Page 277 and 278:
Appetrdr*' cenotvprc ìlêans fot j
- Page 279 and 280:
^ppendlx conrlnue¿- Genotype Plán
- Page 281 and 282:
.9anul¡uor xlpuâd¡¡V ezro tzz ,
- Page 283 and 284:
^pIe¡¡¿tx conrtnued. Solu It lß
- Page 285:
¿\tÎen¿lr conÈtnu€d, .,¡ÃE