facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT<br />
Impacts to Visitor Use and Experience<br />
No-Action Alternative<br />
Under the No-Action Alternative, additional exhibit <strong>plan</strong>ning would occur on a site-bysite<br />
basis. It is anticipated that visitor use at the <strong>Zoo</strong> would reach and exceed preexisting<br />
levels of three million visitors, which was the visitation level prior to September 11,<br />
2001. The visitor entries would not be consolidated, and visitors would continue to enter<br />
the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> in up to 13 different locations. As a result, the visitor would not have a<br />
clear sense of arrival and visitor services at the entry points would not be readily<br />
available. An in-park transportation system that would provide relief from the steep<br />
topography would not be implemented and service vehicles would continue to use the<br />
same roads as <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> visitors. The visitor experience at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> would<br />
continue to be adversely affected by not having a clear sense of arrival, lack of visitor<br />
amenities at clearly defined entry points spread evenly throughout the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>, lack<br />
of internal transportation to help mitigate the steep topography, and continued conflicts<br />
between service vehicles and visitors. Therefore, the No-Action Alternative would have<br />
minor adverse long-term impacts to the visitor experience.<br />
Alternative A<br />
Under Alternative A, new exhibits would be added and existing exhibits revitalized.<br />
Parking would be increased, and revitalized entrances, including visitor amenities and<br />
services, would improve the arrival and interpretive experience. Circulation and<br />
navigation throughout the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> would be improved.<br />
Activities most likely to affect visitor use and experience under Alternative A include:<br />
Reclamation of Parking Lots A and B and the Bus Lot for the creation of new<br />
large multi-species exhibit areas,<br />
New Beaver Valley exhibits and walkways;<br />
Renewal of older exhibits;<br />
Revitalization of visitor entrances at Connecticut Avenue, Midpoint entry, and<br />
Harvard Street Bridge/Beach Drive;<br />
New parking deck structure at current Parking Lot C site and two-story<br />
underground parking structure near the Connecticut Avenue entry; and<br />
Construction of an aerial tram system.<br />
The implementation of Alternative A would renew park infrastructure by reclaiming flat<br />
and gently sloping areas for utilization as exhibit areas. Parking Lots A and B and the<br />
Bus Lot would be reclaimed and older exhibits and flat land areas would be revitalized<br />
for visitor use. The addition of large exhibits in areas with more favorable topography<br />
would have a long-term beneficial impact to the visitor experience.<br />
The new Beaver Valley exhibits and walkways would be designed to separate park<br />
service from visitor circulation through a series of bridges, structures, lifts, and ramps. A<br />
new service drive would separate service vehicles and visitors on Olmstead Walk. This<br />
action would enhance the visitor experience both through new exhibits, and by dedicating<br />
the walkways exclusively to visitor use, without conflicts with service vehicles. The<br />
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION – NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK 98 | P a g e