facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT<br />
anticipated that rehabilitations of the Propagation Building and the Police/Public<br />
Restroom Building will generally be restricted to interior modifications to include<br />
upgrading the building systems, interior renovations, and exhibit <strong>renewal</strong>s. Exterior<br />
changes to the buildings’ character-defining features are not anticipated. However, if<br />
such work were needed, rehabilitation efforts would strive for final designs that retain<br />
architectural features that make it unique as well as retain the massing, exterior materials,<br />
and fenestration pattern which is in keeping with the Secretary of the Interior’s<br />
Guidelines for the Treatment of Historic Properties.<br />
The Holt House is individually listed in the <strong>National</strong> Register. Plans to rehabilitate this<br />
structure, which derives its significance as one of the remaining 5-part Georgian <strong>plan</strong><br />
homes, should follow the Secretary of the Interiors Guidelines for the Treatment of<br />
Historic Properties.<br />
In summary, Alternative C would have minor to moderate long term adverse impacts to<br />
the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> Historic Site through the proposed new construction as it would<br />
physically and visually impact several character-defining features. Alternative C would<br />
also have minor to moderate long term beneficial impacts to the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> Historic<br />
Site through the restoration of the setting between the Small Mammal House and Reptile<br />
House and the rehabilitation of the Holt House.<br />
Mitigation for the Preferred Alternative<br />
As design for individual projects initiates, SI will continue to consult with NCPC, CFA,<br />
and DC HPO regarding impacts to historic structures. When applicable, specific<br />
mitigation measures will be detailed as part of the conceptual design process.<br />
B.3 Archeological Resources<br />
An archeological assessment was performed by comparing historic and existing<br />
conditions maps to identify locations with natural (and undisturbed) topography coupled<br />
with interviews with the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>’s staff who is familiar with recent grading and<br />
filling related to construction at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> and a reconnaissance-level field survey.<br />
Landscaping and construction has altered terrain thereby destroying archeological<br />
resources in many areas within the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>. Based on the research and field survey,<br />
16 locations were identified as areas likely to include archeological resources. These<br />
locations have not been confirmed through subsurface excavation.<br />
Six areas with high archeological potential are located in the main part of the <strong>National</strong><br />
<strong>Zoo</strong> grounds, at the head of the valley and around the Lion House. Nine areas are located<br />
on the floodplain along Rock Creek, and one is on a bench of land above the creek. All<br />
of the locations have potential for pre-historic deposits, and one is also a historic site of<br />
the former site of the Columbia Mills. Five locations have been identified as potential<br />
prehistoric quarries.<br />
Any location identified as likely to include archeological resources that are to be<br />
subjected to ground disturbance warrants subsurface testing to determine whether or not<br />
archeological resources are present.<br />
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION – NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK 76 | P a g e