22.07.2013 Views

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT<br />

small in mass and designed in such a manner to be within the existing tree canopy to the<br />

extent possible to minimize being present from properties outside the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>. The<br />

placement of the aerial tram near the Mid-Point entry would not impact the views to and<br />

from the Small Mammals House or Reptile House from Olmsted Walk as the tram would<br />

be on the opposite side of Olmsted Walk.<br />

In summary, Alternative A would have minor long term adverse impacts to<br />

aesthetics/visual resources at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> and surrounding properties because the<br />

parking structure and aerial tram. Alternative A would also have minor long term<br />

beneficial impacts to viewsheds from the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> by providing new viewing<br />

opportunities to view the Adams Morgan and Washington, DC skyline with the<br />

construction of the aerial tram and removal of the Ape House and O-Line.<br />

Alternative B<br />

Under Alternative B, the development of large, multi-species exhibits would occur<br />

throughout the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>. Older exhibits would be rehabilitated, and the flat land<br />

once used for parking would be developed into new exhibits. The Connecticut Avenue<br />

entrance and the Harvard Street Bridge/Beach Drive entrances would be revitalized. A<br />

surface tram would be utilized to assist visitors traversing the steep terrain.<br />

Projects under Alternative B that could have an impact to the viewshed include:<br />

Creation of new, larger, multi-species exhibits; and<br />

Rehabilitation of older exhibits.<br />

The creation of new larger multi-species exhibits has the potential to impact views that<br />

are confined to the interior of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> and views from the exterior looking<br />

toward the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>. The revitalization of Beaver Valley with a series of bridges,<br />

structures, lifts, and ramps to mitigate the topography may impact views to Rock Creek<br />

depending upon final design. Care should be taken during the design process to clearly<br />

articulate the presence of viewsheds. In summary, Alternative B would have negligible<br />

to minor long term adverse impacts to viewsheds.<br />

Alternative C (Preferred Alternative)<br />

Alternative C would include the revitalization of older exhibits throughout the <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Zoo</strong>. Areas once dedicated to surface parking would be reclaimed and utilized in the<br />

development of large, multi-species exhibits. Alternative C also provides for four entry<br />

points, including revitalization of the existing Connecticut Avenue entry, the Mid-Point<br />

entry, the Harvard Street Bridge/Beach Drive entry, and a bus drop-off area. A surface<br />

level tram and aerial tram would provide flexibility in the circulation system and help<br />

visitors navigate the steep terrain.<br />

Projects under Alternative C that would impact the viewsheds associated with the<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> include:<br />

The creation of new large, multi-species exhibits;<br />

Revitalization and creation of four entry points;<br />

Construction of a parking structure at Parking Lot C; and<br />

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION – NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK 85 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!