22.07.2013 Views

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT<br />

Creek ecosystem could disturb areas A010. Ground disturbance in these areas could<br />

damage or destroy archeological resources.<br />

The improvements proposed to alleviate congestion along the North Road through a<br />

comprehensive traffic and parking management strategy include the construction of two<br />

traffic circles and a limited-use turn lane on North Road at the Harvard Street Bridge/<br />

Beach Drive entrance. The traffic circle would physically impact areas A007, A008, and<br />

A009. Ground disturbance in these areas could damage or destroy archeological<br />

resources.<br />

In summary, before any ground disturbance associated with Alternative C improvements,<br />

the presence or absence of archeological resources in these areas of high archeological<br />

potential needs to be verified by testing. Alternative C may have minor to moderate long<br />

term adverse impacts through the proposed new construction as it would physically<br />

impact areas of high potential for prehistoric archeological resources. As the final designs<br />

for these improvements have not been fully developed, consultation with the Washington,<br />

DC Historic Preservation Office through the Section 106 process should establish<br />

appropriate testing and mitigation efforts.<br />

Mitigation for the Preferred Alternative<br />

As design for individual projects commences, SI will continue to consult with NCPC, and<br />

the DC HPO regarding potential impacts to archeological resources. In areas of high<br />

archeological potential, testing will occur prior to any ground disturbing activities. When<br />

applicable, specific mitigation measures for impacts to archeological resources will be<br />

detailed as part of the conceptual design process.<br />

C. Socioeconomics<br />

C.1 Aesthetics/Visual Resources<br />

The area of visual influence a project may have on its surrounding environs is determined<br />

by estimating the visibility of the proposed action to viewers from public places. Factors<br />

that help determine the viewshed include the scale of a project, its proposed location, and<br />

the surrounding topography. The location of visual resources can be described in terms<br />

of foreground, middleground, and background. Resources that may have particular<br />

sensitivity include animal exhibits, historic structures, and background resources such as<br />

Rock Creek Park.<br />

Views that are considered important to the character of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> and the visitor<br />

experience include:<br />

Views from Olmsted Walk at the top of the hill east towards Adams Morgan (see<br />

photo 1)<br />

View near visitor center looking southeast to Adams Morgan, and further south to<br />

the views of the Washington, DC skyline (see photo 2)<br />

View along Olmsted Walk looking to the Great Lawn (see photo 3)<br />

A southern view down Rock Creek from Beaver Valley (see photo 4)<br />

View near Small Mammals House looking southeast to Adams Morgan<br />

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION – NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK 81 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!