facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT<br />
I. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION<br />
A. Introduction<br />
The <strong>Smithsonian</strong> <strong>Institution</strong> (SI) is currently undergoing a comprehensive process to<br />
identify <strong>facilities</strong> and infrastructure needs at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>logical Park (the <strong>National</strong><br />
<strong>Zoo</strong>), and proposes to implement strategies for the two decades through a <strong>master</strong><br />
<strong>plan</strong>ning process. The Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan (The Master Plan) will help<br />
guide <strong>facilities</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> related to animal welfare, research, exhibits,<br />
visitor services, and circulation. The <strong>master</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ning effort compasses two <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong><br />
sites, the public zoological park at Rock Creek Park in Washington, D.C. and the<br />
Conservation Research Center in Front Royal, Virginia. This Environmental Assessment<br />
(EA) describes and addresses the <strong>plan</strong> elements of the alternatives for the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong><br />
Rock Creek site under consideration for the Master Plan.<br />
Recognizing its stewardship responsibilities as an independent trust created by Congress,<br />
SI is committed to integrating environmental considerations into its <strong>plan</strong>ning and<br />
decision-making activities consistent with the spirit of the <strong>National</strong> Environmental Policy<br />
Act (NEPA) of 1969. SI is the lead entity responsible for the preparation of this EA, with<br />
the <strong>National</strong> Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) serving as the responsible federal<br />
agency. To the extent possible at the <strong>master</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ning phase, this project is also<br />
undergoing a review of the project’s potential effects on historic resources consistent with<br />
Section 106 of the <strong>National</strong> Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).<br />
Although the SI is not a “federal agency” within the purview meaning of NEPA and<br />
CEQ, the SI works with federal agencies on NCPC compliance when “federal actions”<br />
occur by those agencies as a result of an SI undertaking. In this case, NCPC’s approval<br />
of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> Rock Creek <strong>master</strong> <strong>plan</strong> can be deemed a federal action. The SI has<br />
prepared this EA to be consistent with NEPA requirements, as amended, and the Council<br />
on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ’s) regulations on implementing NEPA. The latest<br />
NCPC environmental guidelines have been used in preparing this EA.<br />
B. Purpose and Need<br />
The purpose of the Master Plan is to affirm SI’s mission at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> and provide<br />
a physical framework for implementing the Strategic Plan for the next 20 to 25 years.<br />
Facilities at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> are deteriorating due to age. Furthermore, the Master Plan<br />
would identify infrastructure needs and develop an implementation strategy that helps<br />
guide <strong>facilities</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> related to animal welfare, research, exhibits, visitors services, and<br />
circulation at the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>.<br />
The Master Plan is needed to address the following <strong>facilities</strong> concerns:<br />
Animal habitats require constant <strong>renewal</strong> to keep pace with new knowledge of<br />
animal health and well-being;<br />
New science infrastructure, such as laboratories, is necessary to support the<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>’s mission and keep the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> at the forefront of conservation<br />
science;<br />
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION – NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK 1 | P a g e