22.07.2013 Views

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

facilities renewal master plan - National Zoo - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT<br />

buildings. Construction disturbance likely destroyed evidence of any early outbuildings<br />

associated with the nineteenth-century occupation of the Holt House.<br />

Impacts to Archaeological Resources<br />

No-Action Alternative<br />

Under the No-Action Alternative, small scale site improvements would continue for site<br />

improvements, building rehabilitation, and <strong>facilities</strong> updates related to safety, health, and<br />

maintenance. There would be only minor changes that would include ground disturbance.<br />

Such disturbance is unlikely to affect the integrity of the archeological resources. Thus,<br />

the No-Action Alternative is not likely to impact archeological resources.<br />

Alternative A<br />

Under Alternative A, facility improvements would result in revitalization of older<br />

exhibits including renovation of exhibits, construction of new entrances into the <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Zoo</strong>, installation of new transportation <strong>facilities</strong> and construction of new administrative<br />

<strong>facilities</strong>. These improvements could have physical impacts to prehistoric archeological<br />

resources or resources that contribute to the significance of the <strong>National</strong> Register-listed<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong> Historic Site. As a result, Alternative A could result in direct long-term<br />

moderate impacts to areas of high archeological potential. SI has initiated consultation<br />

with the Washington, DC Historic Preservation Office through the Section 106 process.<br />

As a result of this consultation, a programmatic agreement will be sought that identifies<br />

future review requirements and mitigation to be employed during project development.<br />

Future design would consider ways to minimize impacts to areas of high archeological<br />

potential, such as following the principles outlined in The Secretary of Interiors<br />

Guidelines for the Treatment of Historic Properties.<br />

Projects under Alternative A that could have an adverse effect to areas of high<br />

archeological potential include:<br />

Creation of new larger multi-species exhibit areas;<br />

Revitalization of the entrance at Harvard Street Bridge/Beach Drive; and<br />

Transportation improvements including construction of two traffic circles and<br />

the separation of visitor and service vehicle traffic.<br />

The creation of new multi-species exhibit areas, specifically at the Lion-Tiger Hill, could<br />

physically impact areas of high potential for prehistoric archeological resources (A004<br />

and A005). Ground disturbance in these areas could damage or destroy archeological<br />

resources.<br />

The revitalization of the Harvard Street Bridge/Beach Drive entrance, with new <strong>facilities</strong>,<br />

could physically impact areas A007, A008, and A009. The reclamation of surface<br />

parking (Parking Lot D) and the creation of a visitor experience focused on the Rock<br />

Creek ecosystem could disturb areas A010. Ground disturbance in these areas could<br />

damage or destroy archeological resources.<br />

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION – NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK 78 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!