03.08.2013 Views

Edwin Jan Klein - Universiteit Twente

Edwin Jan Klein - Universiteit Twente

Edwin Jan Klein - Universiteit Twente

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

47<br />

Design<br />

In most cases, rather than a single channel there will be multiple channels on the bus<br />

so that the resonators cannot be tuned to be maximally off for all channels. In these<br />

cases the power that is extracted from a channel on the bus can be calculated using:<br />

IL<br />

2<br />

2 2<br />

⎛ µ<br />

⎞<br />

1 − 2χ<br />

r ⋅ µ 1µ<br />

2 ⋅ cos( 2π<br />

⋅ ∆λcr<br />

/ FSR)<br />

+ χ r ⋅ µ 2<br />

= −10log<br />

⎜<br />

⎟<br />

2 2<br />

⎝1<br />

− 2χ<br />

r ⋅ µ 1µ<br />

2 ⋅ cos( 2π<br />

⋅ ∆λcr<br />

/ FSR)<br />

+ µ 1 µ 2 ⋅ χ r ⎠<br />

Through _ ∆λ 2<br />

(3.7)<br />

where ∆λcr is the difference between the center wavelength of a channel on the bus<br />

and the resonance wavelength of the resonator. In a practical application a single free<br />

channel (i.e. a channel that is not present on the bus) might be chosen to “park” all<br />

resonators that should not drop a signal. If the spacing between the channels is<br />

defined as ∆λcs then ∆λcr=∆λcs.<br />

Figure 3.10b shows the through port insertion loss for this situation calculated for this<br />

case where ∆λcr=0.8 nm (≈100 GHz @ λ=1550 nm) for a resonator with R=50 µm and<br />

ng=1.5 at λ0=1550 nm. As can be expected the losses are considerably higher in this<br />

case. For a field coupling of 0.5 the ILThrough has now risen to 0.4 dB (for αr=0.03 dB).<br />

That this can have a significant effect in the behavior of a device is for instance shown<br />

in the drop response measurements of the 1300 nm OADM presented in Chapter 7.<br />

Here the power dropped power by the fourth resonator on the bus is ≈ 2dB lower than<br />

that of the first resonator on the bus.<br />

ILThrough (dB)<br />

8 0.03 dB<br />

0.06 dB<br />

0.16 dB<br />

6<br />

0.31 dB<br />

0.62 dB<br />

1.25 dB<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />

Field coupling coefficient<br />

a)<br />

b)<br />

Figure 3.10. Through port insertion loss as a function of the field coupling coefficient for several<br />

resonator roundtrip losses. In a) the resonator is tuned to be maximally off-resonance for a channel<br />

on the bus while in b) the resonance wavelength of the resonator differs by 0.8 nm from the channel<br />

center wavelength.<br />

3.2.6 Through port on-resonance residual power<br />

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9<br />

Field coupling coefficient<br />

In many applications the small power fraction that is still present in the in the through<br />

port of a resonator at resonance is not an issue. However, in some applications, this<br />

residual power can create some undesirable results.<br />

In the add-drop multiplexer shown in Figure 3.11 for instance the residual power in<br />

the through port of the first resonator can interfere with the signal that is added by the<br />

second resonator. This may result in detection errors in the added signal when its<br />

power is in the same order of magnitude as the power of the through port signal.<br />

ILThrough @100 GHz<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0.03 dB<br />

0.06 dB<br />

0.16 dB<br />

0.31 dB<br />

0.62 dB<br />

1.25 dB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!