Edwin Jan Klein - Universiteit Twente
Edwin Jan Klein - Universiteit Twente
Edwin Jan Klein - Universiteit Twente
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
47<br />
Design<br />
In most cases, rather than a single channel there will be multiple channels on the bus<br />
so that the resonators cannot be tuned to be maximally off for all channels. In these<br />
cases the power that is extracted from a channel on the bus can be calculated using:<br />
IL<br />
2<br />
2 2<br />
⎛ µ<br />
⎞<br />
1 − 2χ<br />
r ⋅ µ 1µ<br />
2 ⋅ cos( 2π<br />
⋅ ∆λcr<br />
/ FSR)<br />
+ χ r ⋅ µ 2<br />
= −10log<br />
⎜<br />
⎟<br />
2 2<br />
⎝1<br />
− 2χ<br />
r ⋅ µ 1µ<br />
2 ⋅ cos( 2π<br />
⋅ ∆λcr<br />
/ FSR)<br />
+ µ 1 µ 2 ⋅ χ r ⎠<br />
Through _ ∆λ 2<br />
(3.7)<br />
where ∆λcr is the difference between the center wavelength of a channel on the bus<br />
and the resonance wavelength of the resonator. In a practical application a single free<br />
channel (i.e. a channel that is not present on the bus) might be chosen to “park” all<br />
resonators that should not drop a signal. If the spacing between the channels is<br />
defined as ∆λcs then ∆λcr=∆λcs.<br />
Figure 3.10b shows the through port insertion loss for this situation calculated for this<br />
case where ∆λcr=0.8 nm (≈100 GHz @ λ=1550 nm) for a resonator with R=50 µm and<br />
ng=1.5 at λ0=1550 nm. As can be expected the losses are considerably higher in this<br />
case. For a field coupling of 0.5 the ILThrough has now risen to 0.4 dB (for αr=0.03 dB).<br />
That this can have a significant effect in the behavior of a device is for instance shown<br />
in the drop response measurements of the 1300 nm OADM presented in Chapter 7.<br />
Here the power dropped power by the fourth resonator on the bus is ≈ 2dB lower than<br />
that of the first resonator on the bus.<br />
ILThrough (dB)<br />
8 0.03 dB<br />
0.06 dB<br />
0.16 dB<br />
6<br />
0.31 dB<br />
0.62 dB<br />
1.25 dB<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />
Field coupling coefficient<br />
a)<br />
b)<br />
Figure 3.10. Through port insertion loss as a function of the field coupling coefficient for several<br />
resonator roundtrip losses. In a) the resonator is tuned to be maximally off-resonance for a channel<br />
on the bus while in b) the resonance wavelength of the resonator differs by 0.8 nm from the channel<br />
center wavelength.<br />
3.2.6 Through port on-resonance residual power<br />
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9<br />
Field coupling coefficient<br />
In many applications the small power fraction that is still present in the in the through<br />
port of a resonator at resonance is not an issue. However, in some applications, this<br />
residual power can create some undesirable results.<br />
In the add-drop multiplexer shown in Figure 3.11 for instance the residual power in<br />
the through port of the first resonator can interfere with the signal that is added by the<br />
second resonator. This may result in detection errors in the added signal when its<br />
power is in the same order of magnitude as the power of the through port signal.<br />
ILThrough @100 GHz<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0.03 dB<br />
0.06 dB<br />
0.16 dB<br />
0.31 dB<br />
0.62 dB<br />
1.25 dB