ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
i<br />
LI'<br />
L<br />
c<br />
i-<br />
L<br />
I -<br />
i<br />
b<br />
L<br />
5-1 5<br />
bypassing <strong>the</strong> prototype stage and constructing a large power reactor demonstration. Such<br />
a prototype program may also be desirable for <strong>the</strong> SSCR, particularly if <strong>the</strong> prototype pro-<br />
gram involved <strong>the</strong> modification of an existing PWR for spectral-shift control ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
<strong>the</strong> construction of a wholly new plant for this purpose.<br />
reactor R&D requirements given for <strong>the</strong> SSCR in Table 5.1-2 are based on <strong>the</strong> assumption<br />
that this prototype stage is bypassed. This can be justified on <strong>the</strong> basis that <strong>the</strong> SSCR is<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r unique among <strong>the</strong> various alternatives because of its close relationship to present<br />
PWR technology.<br />
could be designed so that <strong>the</strong> plant would be operated in ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> conventional poison<br />
control mode or in <strong>the</strong> spectral-shift control mode.<br />
capital investment in <strong>the</strong> plant and <strong>the</strong> power output of <strong>the</strong> plant itself is not at risk.<br />
Likewise, <strong>the</strong> potential for serious licensing delays is largely mitigated, since <strong>the</strong> reac-<br />
tor could initially be operated as a poison-controlled PWR and easily reconfigured for<br />
<strong>the</strong> spectral-shift control once <strong>the</strong> licensing approvals were obtained.<br />
capital at risk is limited to <strong>the</strong> additional expenditures required to realize spectral-<br />
shift control, roughly $30 - $60 million for component R&D, plus rental charges on <strong>the</strong><br />
heavy water inventory. The additional expenditures for design and licensing, $20 - $50<br />
million, would have also been necessary for <strong>the</strong> prototype.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> estimates of <strong>the</strong><br />
In particular, no reactor development would be required and <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />
As a result, a great majority of <strong>the</strong><br />
Consequently, <strong>the</strong><br />
The component R&D would consist of a <strong>the</strong>rmal-hydraulic development task; valves and<br />
seal development; development of D20 upgrader technology; and refueling methods development,<br />
design and testing.<br />
from nucleate boiling correlation for <strong>the</strong> SSCR moderator similar to that which has been<br />
developed for <strong>the</strong> PWR light-water moderator. The correlations are expected to be very<br />
similar, but tests to demonstrate this assumption for <strong>the</strong> various mixtures of heavy and<br />
light water will be required.<br />
The <strong>the</strong>rmal-hydraulic tests would be designed to produce a departure<br />
Valves and seal development will be necessary in order to minimize leakage of <strong>the</strong><br />
heavy-water mixture; reduction of coolant leakage is important both from an economic<br />
standpoint (because of <strong>the</strong> cost of D20) and because of <strong>the</strong> potential radiological hazard<br />
from tritium which is produced in <strong>the</strong> coolant. Methods of reducing coolant leakage from<br />
valves and seals have been extensively explored as part of <strong>the</strong> design effort on heavy-<br />
water reactors and utilization of heavy-water reactor experience is assumed. The R&D<br />
program would address <strong>the</strong> application of <strong>the</strong> technologies developed for <strong>the</strong> heavy-water<br />
reactor to <strong>the</strong> larger size components and higher pressures encountered in <strong>the</strong> SSCR.<br />
The D20 upgrader employed in <strong>the</strong> SSCR is identical in concept to <strong>the</strong> upgraders used<br />
on heavy-water reactors and in <strong>the</strong> last stage (finishing stage) of D20 production facilities.<br />
The sizing of various components in <strong>the</strong> upgrader would, however, be somewhat different for<br />
SSCR application because of <strong>the</strong> range of D20 concentration feeds (resulting from <strong>the</strong><br />
changing D20 concentration during a reactor operating cycle), and because of <strong>the</strong> large<br />
volume of low D20 concentration coolant which must be upgraded toward <strong>the</strong> end of each<br />
operating cycle. The upgrader R&D program would consider <strong>the</strong> sizing of <strong>the</strong> upgrader,