05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

L<br />

i'<br />

hd<br />

.- -<br />

I '<br />

i<br />

t<br />

L<br />

i'<br />

b<br />

i -'<br />

b<br />

L<br />

I,<br />

7-31<br />

taxes, and fuel cycle. The fuel cycle costs were, in turn, divided into seven components --<br />

23 %, urani um , thori um, enrichment , pl u toni um , fabrication , and reprocessing .<br />

It is to be noted that <strong>the</strong> power systems calculated were all assumed to be U.S.<br />

based, <strong>the</strong> input data all being of U.S. origin. With appropriate input modifications,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> model could be used for o<strong>the</strong>r scenarios. For example, it could be used to<br />

analyze <strong>the</strong> potential for <strong>the</strong> deployment of transmuters both to produce power in secure<br />

states and to produce 23% for export to states wishing to base <strong>the</strong>ir own power systems<br />

on <strong>the</strong>rmal reactors without national reprocessing.<br />

7.4.2. Data Base<br />

The data required by <strong>the</strong> model for each reactor type include power level, annual<br />

isotopic charge and discharge, annual fabrication requirements, introduction dates, etc.<br />

These data are presented in Tables 6.1-2 and 6.1-3 in Chapter 6. It is to be pointed out,<br />

however, that <strong>the</strong> data are for reactors of essentially conventional designs, and that <strong>the</strong><br />

up8 requirements for <strong>the</strong> various reactor types could be reduced through design optimiza-<br />

tion.<br />

(Note: The effect of optimizing LWRs has been considered in a separate analysis<br />

and is discussed in Section 7.4.3 below.).<br />

The major parameters in <strong>the</strong> economic data base used for this study are capital costs,<br />

uranium costs, fabrication costs, spent fuel disposal costs, reprocessing costs, and money<br />

costs. The entire data base, which was developed in a joint effort involving government<br />

and industry representatives, is presented in Appendix B.<br />

7.4.3. Results for Price-Limited Uranium Supplies<br />

As noted above, <strong>the</strong> denatured nuclear power systems uti1 ized various combinations<br />

of <strong>the</strong>rmal converters and fast reactors. These in turn were examined under six fuel cycle<br />

options, which are summarized in Table 7.4-1 (Options 4-8). In addition, <strong>the</strong> same reactor<br />

types were examined under three reference fuel cycle options -- a throwaway/stowaway option<br />

(Option 1) and two plutonium-uranium options (Options 2 and 3). Four cases were considered<br />

under each option, each case being distinguished by <strong>the</strong> type of converter being emphasized --<br />

LWRs, SSCRs, HWRs, or HTGRs. Thus a total of 36 different nuclear power systems were<br />

analyzed.<br />

The maximum nuclear capacity and <strong>the</strong> year in which <strong>the</strong> maximum occurs for each<br />

nuclear system studied is shown in Table 7.4-2 for <strong>the</strong> two uranium supply assumptions (see<br />

Fig. 7.4-1). As stated earlier, with <strong>the</strong> intermediate-cost supply it was assumed that 6<br />

million ST of U308 could be recovered at costs less than $160/lb, while with <strong>the</strong> high-cost<br />

supply it was assumed that 3 million ST of u$8 would be available.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!