ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
L<br />
i'<br />
hd<br />
.- -<br />
I '<br />
i<br />
t<br />
L<br />
i'<br />
b<br />
i -'<br />
b<br />
L<br />
I,<br />
7-31<br />
taxes, and fuel cycle. The fuel cycle costs were, in turn, divided into seven components --<br />
23 %, urani um , thori um, enrichment , pl u toni um , fabrication , and reprocessing .<br />
It is to be noted that <strong>the</strong> power systems calculated were all assumed to be U.S.<br />
based, <strong>the</strong> input data all being of U.S. origin. With appropriate input modifications,<br />
however, <strong>the</strong> model could be used for o<strong>the</strong>r scenarios. For example, it could be used to<br />
analyze <strong>the</strong> potential for <strong>the</strong> deployment of transmuters both to produce power in secure<br />
states and to produce 23% for export to states wishing to base <strong>the</strong>ir own power systems<br />
on <strong>the</strong>rmal reactors without national reprocessing.<br />
7.4.2. Data Base<br />
The data required by <strong>the</strong> model for each reactor type include power level, annual<br />
isotopic charge and discharge, annual fabrication requirements, introduction dates, etc.<br />
These data are presented in Tables 6.1-2 and 6.1-3 in Chapter 6. It is to be pointed out,<br />
however, that <strong>the</strong> data are for reactors of essentially conventional designs, and that <strong>the</strong><br />
up8 requirements for <strong>the</strong> various reactor types could be reduced through design optimiza-<br />
tion.<br />
(Note: The effect of optimizing LWRs has been considered in a separate analysis<br />
and is discussed in Section 7.4.3 below.).<br />
The major parameters in <strong>the</strong> economic data base used for this study are capital costs,<br />
uranium costs, fabrication costs, spent fuel disposal costs, reprocessing costs, and money<br />
costs. The entire data base, which was developed in a joint effort involving government<br />
and industry representatives, is presented in Appendix B.<br />
7.4.3. Results for Price-Limited Uranium Supplies<br />
As noted above, <strong>the</strong> denatured nuclear power systems uti1 ized various combinations<br />
of <strong>the</strong>rmal converters and fast reactors. These in turn were examined under six fuel cycle<br />
options, which are summarized in Table 7.4-1 (Options 4-8). In addition, <strong>the</strong> same reactor<br />
types were examined under three reference fuel cycle options -- a throwaway/stowaway option<br />
(Option 1) and two plutonium-uranium options (Options 2 and 3). Four cases were considered<br />
under each option, each case being distinguished by <strong>the</strong> type of converter being emphasized --<br />
LWRs, SSCRs, HWRs, or HTGRs. Thus a total of 36 different nuclear power systems were<br />
analyzed.<br />
The maximum nuclear capacity and <strong>the</strong> year in which <strong>the</strong> maximum occurs for each<br />
nuclear system studied is shown in Table 7.4-2 for <strong>the</strong> two uranium supply assumptions (see<br />
Fig. 7.4-1). As stated earlier, with <strong>the</strong> intermediate-cost supply it was assumed that 6<br />
million ST of U308 could be recovered at costs less than $160/lb, while with <strong>the</strong> high-cost<br />
supply it was assumed that 3 million ST of u$8 would be available.