ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
la<br />
t<br />
L<br />
I<br />
I,<br />
lj<br />
ir<br />
1<br />
Li<br />
c<br />
I<br />
L<br />
L'<br />
B-1<br />
Appendix B. ECONOMIC DATA BASE USED FOR EVALUATIONS OF<br />
NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS<br />
M. R. Shay, D. R. Haffner, W. E. Black, T. M. Helm,<br />
W. G. Jolly, R. W. Hardie, and R. P. Omberg<br />
Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory<br />
The economic data base used in .<strong>the</strong> assessment of <strong>the</strong> impact of denatured fuel cycles in<br />
<strong>the</strong> various nuclear systems options described in Chapter 6 was jointly developed by Combustion<br />
Engineering, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United Engineers and Constructors, Argonne<br />
National Laboratory, Resource Planning Associates, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory,<br />
DOE Division of Uranium Resources and Enrichment, and DOE Division of Nuclear Research and<br />
Applications. The data base includes capital costs, operation and maintenance costs, fuel<br />
fabrication and reprocessing costs, capacity factors, money costs, and uncertainties.<br />
The deflated and present-valued capital costs for LWRs, SSCRs. HTGRs, CANDUs, and FBRs,<br />
excluding interest during construction, are shown in Table B-1.<br />
including interest during construction are shown in Table B-2.<br />
The same capital costs<br />
In ei<strong>the</strong>r case, <strong>the</strong> stream of<br />
expenses incurred during <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> plant is discounted to <strong>the</strong> date of startup<br />
and is measured in dollars of constant purchasing power. The uncertainty ranges included in<br />
Table 8-2 represent current best estimates of <strong>the</strong> most probable variations in capital costs.<br />
For flexibility, <strong>the</strong> uncertainties are expressed relative to <strong>the</strong> reference LWR capital cost.<br />
Table B-1. Capital Costs of Power Plants<br />
Excluding Interest During Construction<br />
The operation and maintenance costs<br />
for <strong>the</strong> same power plants are shown in<br />
Power Plant Type Costs ($/kWe)* Table 6-3. The higher costs for <strong>the</strong> SSCR<br />
and <strong>the</strong> CANDU over <strong>the</strong> standard LWR are due<br />
LWR 500 to <strong>the</strong> heavy water replacement requirement<br />
SSCR 520 + 39 (for D20) = 558<br />
and <strong>the</strong> necessity for performing some<br />
HWR<br />
HTGR<br />
605 t 156 (for D20) = 761<br />
560 to 580<br />
maintenance in atmospheres containing<br />
tritium. Additional minor reactor costs<br />
FBR 625 to 875 are given in Table 8-4.<br />
* Based on 7/1/76 dollars.<br />
Table B-2. Captial Costs of Power Plants Including Interest During Construction<br />
Power Plant<br />
TY Pe<br />
cost<br />
($/kWe)*<br />
Cost Re1 ative<br />
to LWR Cost<br />
cost<br />
Uncertainty<br />
LWR 625 95% to 105% reference cost<br />
SSCR 650 + 40 (heavy water) = 690 +lo% 105% to 120% of LWR cost<br />
HWR 755 + 160 (heavy water) = 915 +46% 120% to 150% of LWR cost<br />
HTGR 71 5 +14% 105% to 125% of LWR cost<br />
FBR 800 +28% 125% to 175% of LWR cost<br />
*Based on 1/1/77 dollars.