05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

--<br />

I;<br />

L<br />

L<br />

I i 1 7<br />

I<br />

L<br />

t<br />

L<br />

E<br />

L<br />

,em-<br />

mE LWR WITH PU~ONIUH TDAMMIIIATION<br />

I I I<br />

1<br />

6-39<br />

The fraction of <strong>the</strong> installed nuclear capacity which for this case must be located<br />

in energy centers is shown in Fig. 6.2-26 as a function of time. The maximum is approximately<br />

120 GWe, which is slightly greater than that for <strong>the</strong> previous case. The amount of nuclear<br />

capacity available for location outside energy centers ranges from approximately 300 GWe in<br />

<strong>the</strong> year 2000 to approximately 500 GWe in <strong>the</strong> year 2025. The maximum annual U308 and enrichment<br />

requirements are 65,000 ST/yr and 45 million SWU/yr, respectively. These are quite similar<br />

to <strong>the</strong> maximum annual requirements for <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> LWR with classical plutonium recycle<br />

(see Fig. 6.2-13).<br />

The disadvantage of this option is that <strong>the</strong> energy support ratio decreases continuously<br />

as <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> U308 supply is approached. Figure 6.2-27 indicates that if a U308<br />

supply of 6.0 million ST below $160/lb were available, <strong>the</strong> system would continue to grow<br />

5TL - LWR WTH PLUTONIUM<br />

TDAMMUTATION<br />

WLMW ANNULL LE(XIRFJ#€NT: /<br />

IL - LWR ON THE<br />

THROIIAWAY CYCE<br />

YEAR<br />

Fig. 6.2-25. The Effect on <strong>the</strong> Nuclear<br />

Contribution of "Transmuting" P1 utoni um<br />

Produced in LWRs to 233U (High-Cost U308<br />

Supply) -<br />

IOX<br />

I I I I I<br />

ie~o iwo na m1o mm l~wl )(YO mo<br />

Fig. 6.2-27. The Effect of U308 Supply<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Nuclear Contribution of LWRs 5n<br />

System with Plutonium "Transmutation" (Case<br />

5TL).<br />

WAR<br />

USE 5lL - THf LWR WllH PLUTONIUM IRAMMUTATION<br />

YEAR<br />

I I<br />

Fig. 6.2-26. Relative Nuclear Contri-<br />

butions of LWRs Located Inside (Pu/Th) and<br />

Outside (Denatured LWRs) Ener y Centers<br />

(Plutonium "Transmuted" to 23 4 U) (High-Cost<br />

U308 SUPPlY) *<br />

until approximately year 2050, and thus <strong>the</strong><br />

high energy support ratio associated with<br />

this option could be maintained much longer.<br />

The maximum annual U308 and enrichment<br />

requirements in this case are 109,000 ST/yr<br />

and 77 million SWU/yr, respectively. Thus,<br />

again we have an option for which <strong>the</strong><br />

principal limitation would be <strong>the</strong> annual<br />

ore and enrichment requirements.<br />

The utilization and movement of fissile<br />

material per GWe of installed capacity for<br />

Case 5TL in <strong>the</strong> year 2035 are shown in Fig. 6.2-28.<br />

The annual U3O8 consumption is approximately<br />

68 ST U,08/GWe, and <strong>the</strong> LWR utilizing plutonium<br />

comprises 18% o f <strong>the</strong> installed capacity. Approximately 260 kg of fissile plutonium per GWe of<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!