05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..a<br />

4<br />

I-<br />

1 '<br />

u<br />

c1<br />

Y<br />

u<br />

L<br />

7-39<br />

between 1991 and 2001 were assumed to have U&, requirements equal to 80% of <strong>the</strong> standard<br />

LWR, with <strong>the</strong> improvements retrofitted to all existing reactors at that time. Finally,<br />

those plants beginning operation after 2001 were assumed to have U308 requirements equal<br />

to 70% o f <strong>the</strong> standard LWR, again with <strong>the</strong> improvements retrofitted to existing plants.<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> effect of a lower enrichment tails assay was examined for both <strong>the</strong><br />

standard and <strong>the</strong> optimized LWR designs.<br />

The standard enrichment tails schedule assumed<br />

that <strong>the</strong> assay fraction was a constant 0.0020. The reduced tails schedule began at 0.0020<br />

but decreased to 0.0005 between 1980 and 2010 and remained constant <strong>the</strong>reafter.<br />

The latter<br />

tails schedule was assumed to represent a changeover to an improved enrichment technology.<br />

The effects of considering both <strong>the</strong> improved LWR design and <strong>the</strong> improved tails<br />

technology are sumnarized in Table 7.4-5. The results show that with tails improvements<br />

alone <strong>the</strong> U308 requirements may be reduced by 16% by year 2029. This reduced level of<br />

U308 consumption translates to an increase in <strong>the</strong> maximum installed capacity of approxi-<br />

mately 60 GWe for standard LWRs on <strong>the</strong> throwaway/stowaway fuel cycle.<br />

Table 7.4-5. Comparison of U308 Utilization of Standard and Improved<br />

LWRs Operating on Throwaway/Stowaway Option With and Without<br />

Improved Tai 1 s<br />

ST U308/GWe<br />

Standard LWR Technology Improved LWR Technolow<br />

Normal Improved Normal Improved<br />

Year Tai 1 s Tai 1 s Tails Tai 1 s<br />

1989 5236 4759 4649 4224<br />

2009 6236 4508 4079 3560<br />

2029 5236 4398 3923 3346<br />

*Normal tails assume 0.2 w/o 235U in 238U; improved tails as-<br />

sumed 0.05 w/o 235U in 238U; 75% capacity factor.<br />

With improved LWR technologies (no tails improvements) <strong>the</strong> U308 consumption levels<br />

could be reduced *25% in year 2029.<br />

maximum installed capacity for optimized LWRs.<br />

technologies were used, <strong>the</strong> maximum achievable installed nuclear capacity would increase<br />

by about 144 GWe.<br />

This translates to an increase of 100 GWe in <strong>the</strong><br />

If both reduced tails and advanced LWR<br />

It is important to place <strong>the</strong>se results within <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> results re-<br />

ported in Table 7.4-2.<br />

improvements are comparable to those for standard LWRs operating on <strong>the</strong> classical Pu/~~*U<br />

recycle mode or on <strong>the</strong> denatured 23% cycle.<br />

The maximum installed nuclear capacities obtained with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

Obviously, if both improved LWRs and Pu<br />

recycle were available, <strong>the</strong> nuclear capacity could be even greater.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!