ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
1<br />
,<br />
I<br />
I<br />
.<br />
7-6<br />
would be quite difficult and would require increasing technological sophistication; how-<br />
ever, adding centrifuges would require only that <strong>the</strong> same device be duplicated as many<br />
times as necessary. Increasing <strong>the</strong> tails assay would require more feed material.<br />
Finally, in considering <strong>the</strong> potential circumvention of <strong>the</strong> isotopic barrier, it is<br />
important to anticipate <strong>the</strong> enrichment technologies that could exist in 20 to 25 years -<br />
<strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong> denatured fuel cycle could be deployed. Technologically advanced<br />
countries already have <strong>the</strong> necessary technological base to design and construct centri-<br />
fuges, and many presently developing countries may have acquired <strong>the</strong> technology base by<br />
that time. Countries with a primitive technology are unlikely to use this route, since<br />
even with <strong>the</strong> financial assets and technically competent personnel <strong>the</strong>y would have <strong>the</strong><br />
difficult task of developing <strong>the</strong> requisite support facilities. O<strong>the</strong>r potential isotope<br />
separation techniques are under development in many countries. Laser isotope separation<br />
(LIS), plasma techniques, aerodynamic methods, chemical techniques, and electromagnetic<br />
separation methods currently show varying degrees of promise.<br />
<strong>the</strong>se methods is discussed in Appendix A.<br />
The current status of<br />
It is impossible to predict <strong>the</strong> ultimate<br />
success or failure of <strong>the</strong>se alternative methods, and hence <strong>the</strong> isotopic separation<br />
capability which might exist in 25 years is even more difficult to estimate. Current<br />
estimates for <strong>the</strong> U.S. development program in LIS and plasma methods suggest that it will<br />
be at least ten years before such methods could be operative on a working industrial<br />
I basis, even with a highly sophisticated R&O effort.<br />
7.1.2. Gamma-Radiation Barrier of Fresh Fuel<br />
The production of 233U results in <strong>the</strong> concomitant production of a small but radio-<br />
actively significant q2antity of 232U through <strong>the</strong> 232Th(n,2n) reaction [and <strong>the</strong> 230Th(n,y)<br />
reaction if 230Th i s present in <strong>the</strong> thorium].<br />
daughter products, <strong>the</strong> gama activity of <strong>the</strong> 233U-containing fuels increases, thus providing<br />
a radiation barrier much more intense than is found in o<strong>the</strong>r fresh fuels.<br />
could be employed to remove <strong>the</strong> 23211 decay products, such a procedure would provide a relatively<br />
low radioactivity for only 10-20 days, since fur<strong>the</strong>r decay of <strong>the</strong> 232U present in <strong>the</strong> fuel<br />
would provide a new population of 228Th and its daughters, <strong>the</strong> activity of which would con-<br />
tinue to increase in intensity for several years.<br />
As <strong>the</strong> 232U decays through 228Th and its<br />
While chemical processing<br />
The concentration of 232U in <strong>the</strong> recycle fuel is usually characterized as so many<br />
parts per million (ppm) of 2sU in total uranium. Due to <strong>the</strong> threshold nature of <strong>the</strong><br />
232Th(n,2n) reaction, <strong>the</strong> 232u concentration varies with <strong>the</strong> neutron spectrum of <strong>the</strong><br />
reactor in which it is produced. It also varies with <strong>the</strong> amount of recycle. For 12%<br />
23% denatured fuel, <strong>the</strong> 232U concentration (in ppm U) ranges from 250 ppm for LWR-<br />
produced 233U to a maximum of 1600 ppm for certain LMFER-derived denatured fuels (see<br />
Section 3.1.3).<br />
<strong>the</strong> 232U concentration would be approximately 8000 ppm, and thus <strong>the</strong> material would be<br />
highly radioactive.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> latter material were enriched to produce weapons-grade material,