05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

id<br />

i<br />

L<br />

1<br />

L<br />

i<br />

h<br />

id<br />

hi<br />

I<br />

1<br />

h<br />

L<br />

i<br />

F.<br />

6.<br />

3-25<br />

to be fabricated in nonradioactive facilities.<br />

to in <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> text as fuel recycle Option 1.<br />

This fueling option will be referred<br />

Fifth-generation recycle of fuel types 0 and E with 93% 235U makeup (Option 1).<br />

First recycle of' fuel type 0, with recycle uranium in all fuel assemblies of a reload<br />

batch. Makeup uranium is 20% and 93% 235U as needed to maintain reactivity. In this<br />

option all fuel would probably require remote fabrication facilities. This fueling<br />

option will be referred to in <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> text as fuel recycle Option 2.<br />

H. Fifth recycle of fuel type G with 235U makeup (Option 2).<br />

The uranium compositions of <strong>the</strong>se fuels are shown in Table 3.3-2.<br />

should be assumed that natural uranium is also available.<br />

Table 3.3-2. Uranium Fuel Mixtures That May Be Available<br />

(Weight Fraction in Urani um)<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong>se, it<br />

Isotope A 6 C 0 E F G H<br />

23211 0 5.02 x lo-' 6.565 x 10-4 0 1.2363 x 10-4 2.445 x lo-' 1.134 x lo-' 2.331 x 10'<br />

23311 0 0.118611 0.11498 0 0.047004 0.0591 4 0.04310 0.05638<br />

Z3"U 1.2 x lo-' 0.008523 0.035108 0.001754 0.005430 0.02115 0.005125 0.020245<br />

235U 0.032 0.002317 0.01255 0.2000 0.13201 0.11 3457 0.1 3765 0.11749<br />

236U 0 0.000036 0.005327 0 0.02303 0.056496 0.021119 0.05386<br />

238U 0.96788 0.870011 0.831228 0.798246 0.792389 0.749522 0.793021 0.75188<br />

-<br />

Description of Fuel Type:<br />

A - 3.2 wt X z35U from natural uranium.<br />

6 - Thorium breeder blanket fuel denatured with depleted uranium.<br />

C - Flfth generation recycle of B with thorium breeder blanket makeup.<br />

0 - 20 wt % 23511 from natural uranium.<br />

E - First recycle of D with 93 wt X 235U in uranium makeup (Option 1. see note).<br />

F - Flfth generation recycle of 0 with 93 wt % 235U in uranium makeup (Option 1. see note).<br />

G - First recycle of 0 with 93 wt X 235U makeup (Option 2, see note .<br />

H - Fifth recycle of D with 93 wt X 235U makeup (Option 2. see notel.<br />

- NOTE: Fuel types E and F are deslgned so that not all of <strong>the</strong> fuel in a reload batch Is recyclf fuel; some of <strong>the</strong><br />

reload batch will contain fuel type D. This situation Is analogous to <strong>the</strong> "traditional concept envisioned<br />

for plutonium recycle fuels. This concept allows some of <strong>the</strong> fuel to be fabricated in non-radioactive<br />

facillties, and is referred to In <strong>the</strong> text as fuel recycle Option 1.<br />

Fuel types G and H result if every assembly in <strong>the</strong> reload batch contains recycle fuel. The fueling mde 1s<br />

referred to as Option 2.<br />

Isotopic Separation of Fresh Fuel<br />

Selection of Separation Facility. Of <strong>the</strong> various uranium isotope separation processes<br />

which have been conceived, only <strong>the</strong> current technology processes (i.e., gaseous diffusion,<br />

gas centrifuge, <strong>the</strong> Becker nozzle and <strong>the</strong> South African fixed wall centrifuge) and possibly<br />

<strong>the</strong> calutron process could be considered as near-term candidates for a clandestine facility<br />

capable of enriching divered reactor fuel.<br />

technology.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong>se, <strong>the</strong> gas centrifuge may be <strong>the</strong> preferred<br />

This conclusion is directly related to <strong>the</strong> proven advantages of <strong>the</strong> process,<br />

which include a high separation factor per machine, low electrical power needs, and <strong>the</strong><br />

adaptability to small low-capacity but high-enrichment plants. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, more national groups<br />

(i.e., <strong>the</strong> U.S., England, Holland, Germany, Japan, Australia, and France) have operated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!