05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3-38<br />

An additional factor relative to <strong>the</strong> deterrent effect is <strong>the</strong> time required to carry<br />

out <strong>the</strong> necessary operations. This is illustrated by Table 3.3-11, which gives <strong>the</strong> dose<br />

rates (in rem/hr) required to acquire each of three total doses within various times,<br />

varying from a totally incapacitating 20,000 rem to a prudent individual's dose of 100<br />

rem. Thus, to divert a small amount of fissile material to a portable, shielded container<br />

might take less than 10 seconds, in which case a dose rate of lo7 rem/hr would be required<br />

to prevent completion of <strong>the</strong> transfer. Only 200 rem/hr would be required, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hand, to deliver a lethal dose to someone who spends five hours close to unshielded 233U<br />

while performing <strong>the</strong> complex operations required to fabricate components for an explosive<br />

device. The maximum anticipated concentration of 232U as projected for denatured fuel<br />

does not provide sufficient intensity to reach totally disabling levels. Fast-reactor<br />

bred material (depending on time after separation and quantity as well as 232U concentration)<br />

can come within <strong>the</strong> lOO-rem/hr range.<br />

Table 3.3-11. Gama-Ray Dose Rates for Three Levels of Total Dose vs. Exposure Timea<br />

Time of Exposure<br />

10 sec<br />

1 min<br />

5 min<br />

30 min<br />

1 hr<br />

5 hr<br />

12 hr<br />

aFrom Ref. 18.<br />

Dose Rate (rem/hr) Required to Deliver Total Dose of<br />

100 rem 1000 rem 20,000 rem<br />

36,000 360,000 7,400,000<br />

6,000 60 , 000 1,200,000<br />

1,200 12,000 240,000<br />

200 2,000 40,000<br />

100 1,000 20,000<br />

20 200 4,000<br />

8.3 83 1,660<br />

The fact that <strong>the</strong> level of radiation of 232U-contaminated 233U increases with time<br />

is a major disadvantage for a 233U-based nuclear explosive device. There is a window of<br />

10 to 20 days immediately following chemical separation when <strong>the</strong> material is comparatively<br />

inactive due to <strong>the</strong> removal of 228Th and its daughters. Having to deliver a device less<br />

than ten days after fabricating it would be undesirable. While <strong>the</strong> tamper would provide<br />

some shielding, this short time schedule would complicate <strong>the</strong> situation considerably.<br />

For a national program it is likely that <strong>the</strong> military would want a clean 233U<br />

weapon. This could be accomplished to a large degree by separating <strong>the</strong> 232U from <strong>the</strong><br />

233U using gas centrifugation. However, because <strong>the</strong> masses are only 1 amu apart this<br />

requires several thousand centrifuges to make 100 kg of clean material per year (see Section<br />

3.4.4). A nation possessing this isotopic separation capability would <strong>the</strong>refore probably<br />

choose to enrich natural uranium ra<strong>the</strong>r than to utilize denatured fuel, thus eliminating<br />

<strong>the</strong> 232U-induced complications.<br />

L<br />

L

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!