05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-5388 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4-1 2<br />

4.1. LIGHT-WATER REACTORS<br />

J. C. Cleveland<br />

Oak Ridge National Laboratory<br />

If an alternate cycle such as <strong>the</strong> denatured cycle is to have a significant early impact,<br />

it must be implemented in LGIRs already operating in <strong>the</strong> United States or soon to be operating.<br />

The current national LWR capacity is about 48 GWe and LWRs that will provide a total capacity<br />

of 150 to 200 GWe by 1990 are ei<strong>the</strong>r under construction or on order. Much of <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

analyses of <strong>the</strong> denatured 233U fuel cycle has <strong>the</strong>refore been performed for current LWR core<br />

and fuel assembly designs under <strong>the</strong> assumption that subsequent to <strong>the</strong> required fuels development<br />

and demonstration phase for thoria fuels <strong>the</strong>se fuels could be used as reload fuels for operating<br />

LWRs. It should be noted, however, that <strong>the</strong>se current LWR designs were optimized to minimize<br />

power costs with LEU fuels and plutonium recycle, and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y do not represent optimum<br />

designs for <strong>the</strong> denatured cycle. Also excluded from this study are any improvements in reac-<br />

tor design and operating strategies that would improve in-situ utilization of bred fuel and<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> nonproductive loss of neutrons in LWRs operating on <strong>the</strong> once-through cycle. Studies<br />

to consider such improvements have recently been undertaken as part of NASAP (Nonproliferation<br />

A1 ternative Systems Assessment Program).<br />

4.1.1. Pressurized Water Reactors<br />

Mass flow calculations for PWRs presented in this chapter were performed primarily<br />

by Combustion Engineering, with some additional results presented from <strong>ORNL</strong> calculations.<br />

The Combu'stion Engineering System 80TM (PWR) design was used in all of <strong>the</strong>se analyses. A<br />

description of <strong>the</strong> core and fuel assembly design is presented in <strong>the</strong> Combustion Engineering<br />

Standard Safety Analysis Report (CESSAR) . The following cases have been<br />

Dispersible Resource-Based Fuels<br />

A.<br />

B.<br />

LEU (i.e., low enriched uranium, -3% 235U in 238U), no recycle.<br />

MEU/Th (i.e., medium-enriched uranium, 20% 235U in 238U, mixed with 232Th),<br />

no recycle.<br />

C. LEU, recycle of uranium only, 235U makeup.<br />

D. MEU/Th, recycle of uranium (235U + 233U), 20% 235U makeup.*<br />

Dispersible Denatured Fuel<br />

E. Denatured 233U (i,e., -12% 233U in 238U, mixed with 232Th), recycle of uranium,<br />

233U makeup.<br />

*An alternate case utilizing 93% 235U as a fissile topping for recovered recycle uranium and<br />

utilizing 20% 235U as fresh makeup is also discussed by Combustion Engineering.<br />

tl<br />

L<br />

tj<br />

L]:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!