15.11.2013 Views

Nepal Hazard Risk Assessment - Asia-Pacific Gateway for Disaster ...

Nepal Hazard Risk Assessment - Asia-Pacific Gateway for Disaster ...

Nepal Hazard Risk Assessment - Asia-Pacific Gateway for Disaster ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Nepal</strong> <strong>Hazard</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

1 ANNEXURE 1<br />

GIS METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF LANDSLIDE HAZARD<br />

1.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The major triggering factors <strong>for</strong> landslides are extreme precipitation events, strong earthquakes, and<br />

human activity. The strong correlation between landslides and other natural hazard triggers like<br />

hurricanes or earthquakes has resulted in an underestimation of their socio-economic impact. This<br />

underestimation contributes to reduced awareness and concern of both authorities and general public<br />

about landslide risk.<br />

1.2 MODEL FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD EVALUATION<br />

The term "landslide" in this study refers to events involving gravity-driven rapid mass movement downslope,<br />

like rockslides, debris flows, and rainfall- and earthquake-induced slides; which pose a threat to<br />

human life. Slow moving slides have significant economic consequences <strong>for</strong> constructions and<br />

infrastructure, but rarely cause any fatalities.<br />

to the in<strong>for</strong>mation available in landslide inventories and physical processes. The general approach used<br />

in the present study is a modified and improved version of the approach used by Nadim et al. (2006).<br />

One of the key improvements in the present model is the increased resolution on the DEM and<br />

consequently the slope data. In previous studies a 30 arc second resolution was used, whereas the present<br />

study uses the 3 arc seconds SRTM dataset.<br />

The hazard maps are divided in precipitation induced landslide hazard and earthquake induced landslide<br />

hazard. The landslide hazard indices were estimated using the following equations:<br />

H r = (S r x Six S h x S v )xT p (1)<br />

He = (Sr X Si X Sh X Sv) x T s (2)<br />

where Hr and He are landslide hazard indices <strong>for</strong> rainfall and earthquake induced landslides respectively,<br />

Sr is the slope factor within a selected grid, Sl is lithological (or geological) conditions factor, S h<br />

describes the soil moisture condition, T p is the precipitation factor and T s describes the seismic<br />

conditions. The index Sv described the vegetation cover.<br />

1.2.1 SLOPE FACTOR SR<br />

The slope factor represents the natural landscape ruggedness within a grid unit. In February 2000, NASA<br />

collected elevation data <strong>for</strong> much of the world using a radar instrument aboard the Space Shuttle. The<br />

raw data collected on the mission were processed over three years. NASA has now released a global<br />

elevation dataset called SRTM3, referring to the name of the mission and the resolution of the data,<br />

which is 3 arc-seconds, or approximately 90 by 90 m per data sample near the equator. The SRTM3 data<br />

set covers the globe from 60 degrees south latitude to 60 degrees north latitude. The vertical accuracy is<br />

estimated such that 90% of posts are within 16m tolerance of the actual position.<br />

Table 1.1. Slope angle classification.<br />

Figure 1.1. Schematic approach <strong>for</strong> landslide hazard and risk evaluation.<br />

As part of the "Natural <strong>Disaster</strong> Hotspots" project of The World Bank (Dilley et al., 2005), (Nadim et<br />

al., 2006) adopted a simplified first-pass analysis method <strong>for</strong> identifying the global landslide hazard and<br />

risk "hotspots",. The scale of their analysis was a grid of roughly 1km x 1km pixels where landslide<br />

hazard, defined as the annual probability of occurrence of a potentially destructive landslide event, was<br />

estimated by an appropriate combination of the triggering factors (mainly extreme precipitation and<br />

seismicity) and susceptibility factors (slope, lithology, and soil moisture). The principles of the method<br />

are depicted in Figure 1.1. The weights of different triggering and susceptibility factors were calibrated<br />

Range of slopes angle (unit 1/100 degrees) Classification Sr<br />

0000 - 0100 Very low 0<br />

0101 - 0600 Low 1<br />

0601 - 1200 Moderate 2<br />

1201 - 1800 Medium 3<br />

1801 - 2400 High 4<br />

2401 - 4000 Very high 5<br />

4001 - 4500 Medium 3<br />

4501 - 9000 Medium 3<br />

In the analyses, the slope data were reclassified on a geographical grid (WGS84). Cells were distributed<br />

in the 6 different categories (0 - 5) presented in the category table above.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!