23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

“soft” accountability mechanisms under the banner of corporate social<br />

responsibility (CSR). 2 Among them, a small number of cross-border<br />

instruments, referred to as “international framework agreements” (IFAs)<br />

or “global framework agreements”, have emerged since the late 1980s.<br />

They constitute the focus of the present volume.<br />

IFAs can be found under different names, for example “agreement<br />

on code of conduct” (IKEA in 1988); 3 “joint declaration on human<br />

rights and working conditions” (BMW in 2005); “international framework<br />

agreement” (EADS in 2005); “global framework agreement on the<br />

development of good working conditions in operations worldwide” (Veidekke<br />

in 2005). Their common element is that they are negotiated<br />

instruments between MNEs and global union federations (GUFs),<br />

namely international federations of national unions by sector of activity.<br />

This volume deals mainly with various facets of IFAs. Yet it also<br />

examines other efforts to introduce a global “social floor”, i.e., rights and<br />

entitlements accessible to all workers in the global economy, through<br />

cross-border organization, dialogue and regulation in specific sectors,<br />

namely the maritime and textile sectors. It also addresses relevant issues<br />

such as the possibility of cross-border solidarity action as a complement<br />

to cross-border dialogue.<br />

Data concerning IFAs<br />

At the time of writing (December 2007), 62 IFAs existed in the<br />

world, covering approximately 5.3 million workers. Detailed information<br />

in this regard is provided in table 1 in the appendix. While the<br />

number of IFAs is small compared with the number of unilateral codes<br />

of conduct adopted by MNEs and with the global workforce of MNEs<br />

(roughly 95 million excluding subcontractors and suppliers, according<br />

to Kim, 2006), the pace at which IFAs have spread since 1988 when the<br />

first such instrument was concluded has accelerated dramatically: whereas<br />

23 IFAs were concluded from 1988 to 2002 (15 years), another 33 were<br />

signed in the four-year period 2003–2006. By 2005, at least eight MNEs<br />

2<br />

This notion includes corporate codes of conduct, statements on business ethics, management standards,<br />

monitoring initiatives and multi-stakeholder initiatives. For a brief overview, see Servais (2005).<br />

3<br />

A list of the enterprises and IFAs can be found in the appendix.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!